NeilTheCop
Member
I'm still interested what drug was involved.
Big difference between growing and selling weed and operating a meth lab.
Big difference between growing and selling weed and operating a meth lab.
With felony charges pending, there will not be much difference in how other countries will view the drugs involved.I'm still interested what drug was involved.
Big difference between growing and selling weed and operating a meth lab.
Many countries have legalized weed, none to my knowledge have legalized meth and other hard drugs.With felony charges pending, there will not be much difference in how other countries will view the drugs involved.
Here is a link to information on Texas drug laws, published by Southern Methodist University (for the education of their student population):
https://www.smu.edu/StudentAffairs/HealthCenter/Counseling/DrugfreeCampus/TXStateLawPenalties
The drug is not as important as the fact that there are felony charges.Many countries have legalized weed, none to my knowledge have legalized meth and other hard drugs.
True.The drug is not as important as the fact that there are felony charges.
If he leaves, he better be comfortable with the idea of never, ever returning to the U.S. because he may be arrested and prosecuted whenever he returns. Since the charges are already filed there will be no statute of limitations problem for the state. And he'd best ensure that the country to which he goes will not have a problem admitting an accused drug dealer. A number of nations, particularly in Asia, have very harsh drug laws and will not take persons who are known or suspected drug dealers. Finally, even if he is good to go to that country, traveling to other nations for his work could be a problem as it is possible any one of them might hold him and extradite him to the U.S.
Whether the state feels it is worth the time, cost and trouble of pursuing extradition is a question mark.Thanks for your response. So far it has been the most relevant to my question. However, I am asking what is the likeliness that the case would be made federal in order for an extradition to be made? It is my understanding (and please correct me if I am wrong) that in order to extradite from a foreign territory it needs to be at a government level and the costs involved can be quite high. Is it worth the trouble?
Points taken regarding the irrelevancy of the accused employment history etc and the irrelevance of my own opinions - agreed.
Whether the state feels it is worth the time, cost and trouble of pursuing extradition is a question mark.
The person involved would no doubt be smarter to simply hire a good criminal defense attorney rather than thinking of leaving the country to avoid prosecution.
Quincy, yes we get it...
There is only so much a good attorney can do in a corrupt legal system that is all about convictions and $$
Thank you for the input regarding the question mark on the states stance in the persuit of extradition.
The legal system is only corrupt when the outcome is not in your favor. The same flawed thinking also applies to stock price moves, election results etcIf the system is corrupt then of course he would be extradited.![]()
Thanks for your response. So far it has been the most relevant to my question. However, I am asking what is the likeliness that the case would be made federal in order for an extradition to be made?
I am asking what is the likeliness that the case would be made federal in order for an extradition to be made?