B
betterthanher
Guest
Child support agencies (especially) aren't usually very smart when they draw up language. And ordering someone to carry insurance whether they are employed or not is one example.angieb888 said:It does state in their papers that he is solely(sp) responsible for her insurance coverage regardless if he is employed or not. At one point in time he was providing outside coverage for her when he was on unemployment.
It's pretty difficult to pay for private insurance when you aren't employed. Also, CSE might have a "ceiling" as to the cost of any type of insurance -- whether it's from an employer or from an outside source. For example, CSE might say if the yearly cost of insurance is over 30% of his income, it would be considered an "outrageous" cost & not order him to carry it (unless he solely chose to). If the other parent has access to affordable insurance, the order would be amended to reflect that and the other parent's cs obligation would be changed as well.