HOA Liability Dark Area of Community

[Zigner]

Which begs another question. What recourse does the street have after being discriminated against...assuming the street has concrete evidence of said discrimination?

Hahaha

 

[Just Blue]

Hahaha

It was a cute pun....

 

[adjusterjack]

It was a cute pun....

Yes, it was. I give it an 11.

 

[Just Blue]

Yes, it was. I give it an 11.

Thank You! Thank You very much!

 

[stealth2]

Thank You! Thank You very much!

Waiting for:

"You like me! You really like me!"

 

[Just Blue]

Waiting for:

"You like me! You really like me!"

I used that the other day...Don't want to wear it out.

 

[Pedas2]

But this raises a question: HOW do you discriminate against a street?

I understand that it's legal to discriminate against a street in an HOA, by removing a streetlight. It's ironic that some HOA members who thought it was a waste of money to install the streetlight on the darkest street, were opposed to having streetlights in front of their houses removed on the street they reside in.

 

[Pedas2]

How is it possible to know whether a case that has been remanded by a state Supreme Court to a lower trial court, actually was re-tried? Most people assume the state Supreme Court ruling stands. HOA attorneys still cite this case as a reason for an HOA to maintain a safe and secure neighborhood and act as a landlord.

 

[Zigner]

I understand that it's legal to discriminate against a street in an HOA, by removing a streetlight. It's ironic that some HOA members who thought it was a waste of money to install the streetlight on the darkest street, were opposed to having streetlights in front of their houses removed on the street they reside in.

It's not a question of whether it's legal to discriminate against a "street", rather, it's a question of whether it's possible (it's not).

 

[stealth2]

I understand that it's legal to discriminate against a street in an HOA, by removing a streetlight. It's ironic that some HOA members who thought it was a waste of money to install the streetlight on the darkest street, were opposed to having streetlights in front of their houses removed on the street they reside in.

DUDE - you can discriminate against people - NOT inanimate objects.

 

[Pedas2]

It's not a question of whether it's legal to discriminate against a "street", rather, it's a question of whether it's possible (it's not).

Yes, logically it is impossible to discriminate against an inanimate object, but it is understood that the discussion is about HOA members living on that street their monthly dues support the maintenance of.

 

[Pedas2]

DUDE - you can discriminate against people - NOT inanimate objects.

Of course, it is understood the discussion is about residents on a street, not the street itself.

 

[Zigner]

Of course, it is understood the discussion is about residents on a street, not the street itself.

The residents aren't being discriminated against. You have a misconception of the meaning of "discrimination".

 

[PayrollHRGuy]

Of course, it is understood the discussion is about residents on a street, not the street itself.

It may be understood by YOU. To everyone else it just looks like you are clueless.

 

[Pedas2]

The residents aren't being discriminated against. You have a misconception of the meaning of "discrimination".

No I don't. The residents on the dark street have been discriminated against for decades.