I didn't demand verification i asked a question about his background there's a difference in the wording which if you know anything about law you would know wording is key. Meaning something like what was his MOS or duties, years of service ect? All of which could be answered without mentioning any type of person information. But i'm tired of arguing with people on this website and jumping to conclusions hopefully anyone coming to this site looking for help double checks any of the information they have been provided because it seems there's a lot of people here trying to degrade and tell people there is no hope instead of simply providing the information they are trying to seek. Good luck to all, apparently there is a reason why this website is free.
You must mean wording like the article that you cited to support your claim that actually said the opposite. There also seems to be a person that provides information that is not accurate and doesn't like that being pointed out.