How will this all work?

[Neal1421]

you really want some advice get a lawer these people on here don't know jack about the law and really helping no one. anyone who says anything remotly relevent they put down insult or debate with. you end up spending more time reading people arguing then you do get your info.

Your advice was incorrect, BB told you that. Move on. YOU obviously know nothing about the law.

 

[childrenRpeople]

LOL
You're making me laugh
I admit that I've gotten some GREAT advice on these forums.
But as it is with all of Life, it takes all kinds.
Opinions are like belly-buttons...everyone has one.
I find that it just takes a bit of "filtering" through some debris to get the answers I need.

 

[BelizeBreeze]

you really want some advice get a lawer these people on here don't know jack about the law and really helping no one. anyone who says anything remotly relevent they put down insult or debate with. you end up spending more time reading people arguing then you do get your info.

Well, let's see now.

YOU SAID:

support and custody are two different things. one has no effect on the other.

I suppose that if the two are completely separate in that one has no effect on the other, parents all over the country without custody should be getting child support...correct?

The fact is, this poster, regardless of 'feelings' doesn't know what will happen tomorrow. She can be homeless and on state aid or she can land a fortune in probate.

However, the law requires BOTH parents, regardless of custody, to financially support the child. And even if the two of them are the best of friends, all such 'agreements' should be reduced to a court order.

Now, why your little uninformed pea brain may ask?

Scenario: (it happens all the time). They continue without any type of formal order from the court. Daddy dearest gets remarried and completes a will leaving everything to his new wife.

Then, in the throes of passion on his wedding night, he has a heart attack and dies.

Guess what? The child is left not only without a father but without a penny. Based on your advice here and in other threads, so what? After all, it's still all goody feelings.

Whereas, if there is a formal court order for support, then the child, through her guardian, has a claim on the father's estate and support will continue until majority or the order stipulates.

THAT, PA fool, is why people actually study the law. So others may benefit.

 

[Shay-Pari'e]

BB, do remember erose's problem? Her X got a order of protection from abuse for the child and she then lost custody because she was a no show at the hearing.

I]

 

[erosePA]

Well, let's see now.

YOU SAID:
I suppose that if the two are completely separate in that one has no effect on the other, parents all over the country without custody should be getting child support...correct?

The fact is, this poster, regardless of 'feelings' doesn't know what will happen tomorrow. She can be homeless and on state aid or she can land a fortune in probate.

However, the law requires BOTH parents, regardless of custody, to financially support the child. And even if the two of them are the best of friends, all such 'agreements' should be reduced to a court order.

Now, why your little uninformed pea brain may ask?

Scenario: (it happens all the time). They continue without any type of formal order from the court. Daddy dearest gets remarried and completes a will leaving everything to his new wife.

Then, in the throes of passion on his wedding night, he has a heart attack and dies.

Guess what? The child is left not only without a father but without a penny. Based on your advice here and in other threads, so what? After all, it's still all goody feelings.

Whereas, if there is a formal court order for support, then the child, through her guardian, has a claim on the father's estate and support will continue until majority or the order stipulates.

THAT, PA fool, is why people actually study the law. So others may benefit.

in what state does 50/50 result in no support?

 

[BelizeBreeze]

in what state does 50/50 result in no support?

In what reality do you live?

 

[erosePA]

In what reality do you live?

answer, you call that an answer? answer the question please.

 

[childrenRpeople]

Munching popcorn here

 

[BelizeBreeze]

answer, you call that an answer? answer the question please.

In every state in the union stupid. And why? There are any number of reasons why no support may be ordered. There are even state statutes (MISSOURI FOR ONE) which calculates support on not only both parties income but also amount of time spent with the child.

So, brainless wonder, if both parties make the same amount of money adn they both have the child 50/50, guess what? No support is ordered.

Although I never said anything about NO SUPPORT....that was your drugs talking.

 

[Just Blue]

Munching popcorn here

Umm...pass it over here...I love watching a good trouncing!

 

[erosePA]

BB, do remember erose's problem? Her X got a order of protection from abuse for the child and she then lost custody because she was a no show at the hearing.

/I]

ya fifteen munites late but all they could give me was a tough luck.
some of you didn't even know you can't appeaL A DEFAULT, you can reopen one but you can't appeal it. all i got was opinoins and no advice as a matter a fact i belive she was one of the ones told me to get a lawyer. so i'm brainless if i tell someone to get a lawyer.

 

[Just Blue]

ya fifteen munites late but all they could give me was a tough luck.
some of you didn't even know you can't appeaL A DEFAULT, you can reopen one but you can't appeal it. all i got was opinoins and no advice as a matter a fact i belive she was one of the ones told me to get a lawyer. so i'm brainless if i tell someone to get a lawyer.

Please use this before posting again...

http://www.m-w.com/

 

[erosePA]

In every state in the union stupid. And why? There are any number of reasons why no support may be ordered. There are even state statutes (MISSOURI FOR ONE) which calculates support on not only both parties income but also amount of time spent with the child.

So, brainless wonder, if both parties make the same amount of money adn they both have the child 50/50, guess what? No support is ordered.

Although I never said anything about NO SUPPORT....that was your drugs talking.

it depends on who the child will reside with. that party is still entitled to support.... in every state of the union

 

[Just Blue]

so i can't spell. doesn't mean i'm an idiot. no reason to sit here and insult me left and right for my legal opinons.

I am a crappy speller myself...but at least I have enough respect for myself and for others that read my posts to do a spell-check!!

There is a reason to insult you for you opinions...they are wrong and you will not stop posting your garbage...LOOK UP the laws and statutes...YOU ARE WRONG...

 

[ceara19]

so i can't spell. doesn't mean i'm an idiot. no reason to sit here and insult me left and right for my legal opinons.

You're being insulted for your "legal" opinions, because they are ONLY opinions, with absolutely no basis in the law. The fact that you are being picked on because you cannot spell is just added BONUS. The fact that you cannot spell is not what makes you an idiot. You are an idiot because you choose to give out incorrect information and then make feeble attempts at defending your answers when you a PROVEN to be wrong.