I purchased an 18 year old home in September 2000 in Plano, Texas. During the option period, I had a home inspector come out and contacted State Farm Insurance to see if they would insure the house. The original roof is a wood shingle. According to the seller's disclosure statement, a "composition" shingle roof overlay was done 4 years ago. The inspector passed the house stating the roof was in good condition and State Farm inspected the house and took pictures and agreed to insure the home.
Two weeks ago, we suffered major ice storms. I filed a claim with State Farm as I had developed six leaks in the roof. I also contacted four different roofing companies to assess the problem. ALL four of the roofing companies said my roof was in poor shape and recommended that the two roofs be removed; and install decking and new shingles. Each company noted that the overlay was of poor quality with 3 different types/brands of shingles. All companies said it would be next to impossible to trace the origin(s) of the leaks and since the overlay was done, it voided the warranty of the shingles. To patch the roof, no roofing company will warranty it. The roofing companies told me that all of this should've come out during the inspection process as the roofing nails were not the right size; 3 different brands of shingles applied; and several comp shingles missing. All four roofing companies will provide me with letters as well as estimates that can be provide in mediation/litigation.
State Farm's adjustor came out today and deemed that the damage was not due to hail, wind, or ice. The adjustor said the damage inside my house would be less than my 1% deductible. He recommended that I have a roofing company water my roof with a hose and patch it.
I know to patch this roof would be insane and more costly in the long run. Also, more damage would be done to my furniture and interior of the house.
Since the inspection company passed the house as well as State Farm passed the house and agreed to insure it, shouldn't one or both of these parties be liable for putting a new roof on my house? Surely, I should have some recourse? I can't imagine the State of Texas would leave me out in the cold.
Your advice is welcome and much needed! Thanks!
Two weeks ago, we suffered major ice storms. I filed a claim with State Farm as I had developed six leaks in the roof. I also contacted four different roofing companies to assess the problem. ALL four of the roofing companies said my roof was in poor shape and recommended that the two roofs be removed; and install decking and new shingles. Each company noted that the overlay was of poor quality with 3 different types/brands of shingles. All companies said it would be next to impossible to trace the origin(s) of the leaks and since the overlay was done, it voided the warranty of the shingles. To patch the roof, no roofing company will warranty it. The roofing companies told me that all of this should've come out during the inspection process as the roofing nails were not the right size; 3 different brands of shingles applied; and several comp shingles missing. All four roofing companies will provide me with letters as well as estimates that can be provide in mediation/litigation.
State Farm's adjustor came out today and deemed that the damage was not due to hail, wind, or ice. The adjustor said the damage inside my house would be less than my 1% deductible. He recommended that I have a roofing company water my roof with a hose and patch it.
I know to patch this roof would be insane and more costly in the long run. Also, more damage would be done to my furniture and interior of the house.
Since the inspection company passed the house as well as State Farm passed the house and agreed to insure it, shouldn't one or both of these parties be liable for putting a new roof on my house? Surely, I should have some recourse? I can't imagine the State of Texas would leave me out in the cold.
Your advice is welcome and much needed! Thanks!