Why don't you explain how reimbursement for psyche injuries is tax exempt. This I can't wait to hear. Your entire village awaits your explanation.You are so right! So go back to your village!

Why don't you explain how reimbursement for psyche injuries is tax exempt. This I can't wait to hear. Your entire village awaits your explanation.You are so right! So go back to your village!
You're right about one thing. I posted nothing really except pointing out the obvious: You're an idiot who doesn't know what he's talking about. Google "origin of claim" and post back with results.![]()
Must have been before the law changes in 1996.
From the audit guidelines (Market Segment Specialization Paper) on settlements (at http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-mssp/a9lawsut.pdf):
The professionals know the IRS is getting a reporting of the settlement and if the return reports less, there will be a letter audit. The response will be checked against the theory (from the same audit guidelines):
But, thanks for playing those who have opinions.
OP, read the MSSP as many of your issues are addressed there. I'd get a tax professional who will look at the facts as this is an area where the reporting will be checked and penalties will apply if the reporting is wrong.
Why don't you explain how reimbursement for psyche injuries is tax exempt. This I can't wait to hear. Your entire village awaits your explanation.![]()
...maybe the experts on this forum should do a bit more research ....
Maybe ... but its easier to just say "village idiot" than it is to do actual research ... to be ignorant or stupid??? Ignorance has its bliss I guess ...
The wording of the settlement agreement is NOT determinative. Have you not read what the PROFESSIONALS here have said?
You're right about one thing. I posted nothing really except pointing out the obvious: You're an idiot who doesn't know what he's talking about. Google "origin of claim" and post back with results.![]()
by this paragraph in my settlement papers it will tell you what i was suing for:
(they are not admitting to guilt, but it shows discrimation for FMLA, emotional distress and physical illness)
in the settlement papers it indicates that they are not admitting to any violations or wrong doing. they also indicated that this release includes, but is not limited to, any claims under the fmla, any claims for any and all damages including damages for emotional distress and physicall illness; and/or any other statutory or common law claims, now existing or hereinafter recognized.
and to anyone that would rather bash people on here for leaving their comment or stating so in so is an idiot should take their opinions elsewhere. we are here for ADVICE and not bashing anyone! people are here to look for answers and to clog up someones response or question is so NOT NICE.
OP doesn't have a workers compensation claim and workers compensation is specifically referenced in tax law.Why don't you go study Workers Compensation Laws? Why do you think Workers Comp. Settlements are not taxable anywhere? It is because compensation for injuries sustained either physically or emotionally aren't considered taxable income.
And all this time I thought the smile on your face was due to gas.Ignorance has its bliss I guess ...
Someone has trouble connecting the dots.Hmmm..."origin of claim" speaks about deductions concerning attorney fees.
Oh you've proven that beyond any doubt.So who is really the idiot?![]()
And as all TAX professionals have noted here, the settlement language is not determinative of anything. The people stating otherwise are those who's posting history indicates a distinct lack of knowledge on all things legal related.by this paragraph in my settlement papers it will tell you what i was suing for:
(they are not admitting to guilt, but it shows discrimation for FMLA, emotional distress and physical illness)
in the settlement papers it indicates that they are not admitting to any violations or wrong doing. they also indicated that this release includes, but is not limited to, any claims under the fmla, any claims for any and all damages including damages for emotional distress and physicall illness; and/or any other statutory or common law claims, now existing or hereinafter recognized.
You were given your answer several times.and to anyone that would rather bash people on here for leaving their comment or stating so in so is an idiot should take their opinions elsewhere. we are here for ADVICE and not bashing anyone! people are here to look for answers and to clog up someones response or question is so NOT NICE.
And as all TAX professionals have noted here, the settlement language is not determinative of anything.