Dad responded to FOC's request for payment. He said:
"These expenses have already been paid by me. Please note that I have also paid for my son's health insurance premium and have not been reimbursed for it."
That is not true. Is the burden of proof on him to show he did in fact pay me for his share? Otherwise, I'm not sure what I can prove in our hearing that has been scheduled as a result of his response. Secondly, how can someone bold face lie about this? Is there not a consequence from the court for saying that when it's not true?
Our orders do not require that he be reimbursed for the health care insurance premium (COBRA) that he's chosen to carry.
Also, our hearing will be in front of a referee. Is everything that is said recorded, even if it's not relevant to the case at hand? I ask because I am worried he is going to get our son his drivers license in a few months, despite my telling him I do not agree to him having one. I am wondering if I find a way to bring this up at the hearing will it then preclude him from being able to say he was not aware of my wishes. *I'm dealing with a lying liar who lies and trying to protect my son and myself.
If he has "paid" for it, kindly have him show his cancelled checks and proof of payment.