Gracie3787
The minor name change was allowed with the consent of one parent because service was made by publication.
Child support services had only a PO Box for the father, this information was included in the petition, however the court would not allow service to a PO box, a letter was written to the paternal grandparents informing them of the petition for a name change, other avenues taken were a search of voter registration, county recorders office, telephone book, all yielded no results for 'dad'.
So, yes, child support services was an avenue that was explored, yet no serviceable address was obtained from them. Believe it or not, just because payments are being made to them, they are not able to disclose the whereabouts of the father to the mother. The original petition asks for the absent parent's address, I included the PO Box I had from my copy of the support order, the court would not allow me to serve the father using the po box address. If the non-consenting parent lives in Calif the service must be made in person, only non-consenting parents living outside Calif can be served by mail. Thus the court being aware of the results of all efforts made allowed service by publication. In this particular case the notice was published for 8 weeks instead of the normally required 4 weeks because the newspaper originally printed the wrong court date, they printed the correction at no charge but it meant a continuation of the original court date and more opportunity for "dad" to contest the name change. No response was filed, the court determined that the petition was reasonable and so ordered the name change.