• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

NCP picking up at school

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

Status
Not open for further replies.
J

jslopez711

Member
rmet4nzkx said:
You need to grow up and think of your child, the best interest of your child is served by having a meaningful relationship with both parents. You are being petty. Many parents are here asking to get their children's NCP to exercise visitation and you are here with joint custody thinking of ways to deny NCP access to his child. No matter that you have gone your differet ways you have to coparent this child for another 15 years, but you will always be her parents, forever. It's his birthday and he is entitiled to his extra parenting time, not restricted by you. It is daycare, not school. What exactly does the order say?
Click to expand...
rmet, the child is 3, so the parents are still going through all of that imaturity as the one you witness. I have observed that in cases like these, the parents don't get "with-it" until much later in the childs life. Sometimes never but one usually does I'd like to believe.
It would be a waste to take this to court since the child will be in K in about 2 years. An even further waste is the OP's inabilty to see that the child needs BOTH of them.
 


K

KWulfken

Junior Member
And no, you (being the custodial parent, I assume) cannot get in trouble for allowing the father to spend more time with his daughter than the papers allow. If anything, it would work in your favor, showing that you want whats best for your child, and are willing to work (outside of court / court fees / taxpayer dollars, etc) together for the benefit of your daughter. I assume she has a legal guardian? The legal guardian will want to make sure the child's best interests are being met, and I am sure you allowing an extra hour or two to the father will be smiled at, not frowned at. I realize your daughter is only 3, but ask her what she wants. If she wants to spend an extra hour or so with her dad, grant her the wish. In the future, you will be glad you did. (Visitation papers usually grant about 2 hours either way (he can p/u 2 hrs late or early if you agree) and (he can drop her off up to 2 hrs late) with out being penalized for it. At least, ours do.
 
C

casa

Senior Member
It's Dad's freakin' BIRTHDAY! :rolleyes:

You'd look like an idiot in court 'explaining' why you didn't let Dad have extra time on his b-day, when the child isn't with you anyway...the child is in daycare (which is not required school). :cool:
 
X

xKellyx

Member
jslopez711 said:
rmet, the child is 3, so the parents are still going through all of that imaturity as the one you witness. I have observed that in cases like these, the parents don't get "with-it" until much later in the childs life. Sometimes never but one usually does I'd like to believe.
It would be a waste to take this to court since the child will be in K in about 2 years. An even further waste is the OP's inabilty to see that the child needs BOTH of them.
Click to expand...


seems to me several of you are missing the point.

WE ARE CURRENTLY RESOLVING OUR MESS IN COURT. I'm not trying to take anything new to court. I have everything that I want.

I love the fact that my daughter's father wants to actually start giving a damn about her, but he still has to learn how to take care of a child.

nevermind, this is like talking to a wall. Just because you have some bs with your children's mothers, does not make our cases anywhere near the same.

Thank You Ldij, you got the point and answered the question
 
stealth2

stealth2

Under the Radar Member
xKellyx said:
I love the fact that my daughter's father wants to actually start giving a damn about her, but he still has to learn how to take care of a child.
Click to expand...

Well..... this might be way off base, but... if he was allowed to do that w/o gatekeeping - he might even rise to the occasion.

xKellyx said:
nevermind, this is like talking to a wall. Just because you have some bs with your children's mothers, does not make our cases anywhere near the same.
Click to expand...

LOLOL First, learn who you're talking to. :rolleyes:
 
X

xKellyx

Member
stealth2 said:
Well..... this might be way off base, but... if he was allowed to do that w/o gatekeeping - he might even rise to the occasion.



LOLOL First, learn who you're talking to. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

This is the first time i've ever tried any sort of "gatekeeping"

Oh, I have!
:rolleyes:
 
stealth2

stealth2

Under the Radar Member
Nope. You assume that those responding to you have some issue with their children's mothers. Nothing could be further from the truth, in several cases.
 
X

xKellyx

Member
stealth2 said:
Nope. You assume that those responding to you have some issue with their children's mothers. Nothing could be further from the truth, in several cases.
Click to expand...


some of them do, do your research. I wasn't implying that comment to everyone who responded, to the rest i just name them a wall.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
Top