my "attraction" as you so eloquently put it, is I would like my husbands offspring to have some kind of a future, OTHER than a career at McDonalds.
MY RESPONSE: Why? Your husband didn't seem to care 15 years ago.
There is also an innocent child involved too, that didn't have a choice. The "potential live birth" deserves to have loving parents, who WANT a child, and who are mature enough to raise one!
MY RESPONSE: Look, it's not going to happen. The reality is, that in the end, the step-daughter will stay right where she's living. Not every child is born with a silver spoon in their mouth. In other words, you haven't given me anything that would indicate a legal need for a "change of circumstances" that would be recognized by a court to require a change in custody. Nothing in these circumstances has given me any "pause" to believe a court is going to change the current orders.
IF my SD chooses to keep this child, she should be encouraged to finish school, so she CAN provide a future for her child, and be guided by people who ARE capable of a mature thought process.
MY RESPONSE: SD has a mother. Stop trying to be one. Not every child "has a future". Your husband made sure of that when he made his Philippine concubine spread her legs, and then left her. Your husband doesn't care enough, or at all, about the situation - - because if he did, he wouldn't have left in the first place.
So, why are you breaking your chops now? Your husband had 15 years to do something about this situation, and didn't. Now, all of a sudden he wants to "play daddy" with his daughter? Look, if having someone else's child in your life is so important, just have one of your own, or adopt.
There is a need for poor, trailer trash, people. It keeps the economy balanced.
IAAL