I really do. My rant yesterday was not necessarily called for, but it was better than stomping around the house screaming at the top of my lungs about the sorry SOB!
And no, no one forced me to sleep with him, and frankly, I don't regret that at all. I got the best microscopic piece of him in that mere minute and a half (and I'm being generous). I know, uncalled for again, but where else can I say that??
For all interested, Father (Not Dad, there is a difference IMO between being a father, not bio-father, but father and a "Daddy") is NOT paying child support. Never has and probably never will. He has reduced his hours at work to 20 per week in order to avoid paying.
HSA is not an option with the plan I enrolled in. My company uses HSA only in coordination with a CDHP or HDHP, both of which has deductibles that I can't pay out of pocket, so I have to go with a standard plan with a FSA.
Is my child or my client more important? She is...obviously, but in order to pay for those braces, the roof over her head, food in her mouth, heat in the winter, clothes on her back all come from me making that client happy. So it boils down to me having to keep the job to see those little smiles.
It infuriates me to no end that the custodial parent (male or female) has to parent alone most of the time. Paying child support does not a parent make, but in my situation, that doesn't apply because he doesn't pay. So...he doesn't pay, he won't help co-parent regarding appointments, doesn't call her on his weeks off. He even wants me to keep her Halloween (his weekend) because he does not want to meet her friends parents. He wants ME to switch weekends (won't do it) so he can "make up the time". He won't even give me a signed agreement saying he's foregoing the weekend. So, I have to show up at the meeting place and wait and document him as a no show. I understand the need for NCP protection because in year's past, the courts did not always give them the consideration they should have had, but these days, we REWARD these people for not being parents at all. If they don't want to be parents, then don't...Leave it to the CP. That's fine, but when doing that, you shouldn't expect to have the same rights as the person doing the work of raising the child.
Nothing about any of this was regarding legal advice...nothing. Because I know legally, I am bound to the court order. I just don't understand the logistics of ruling without taking all of it into consideration including what it means to be a parent. Don't tell that Judges, GALs and Attorney's can't understand this. I know they are parents also - some probably agree with where I am. Why can't rulings be equitable in that way?
Ok (right back where I started

) my rant is done as is my soapbox preaching.
Thanks to all for listening/reading!