• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

"on call " requirement

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

jimmyo1

Junior Member
What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? This explanation is verbose but clarifies my situation. Thank you for reading and your response.
“On call” requirement.
I am currently a maintenance worker at a nursing home. I have one coworker and a maintenance supervisor above us. The working hours for myself and coworker are as follows: One week 7:00am to 3:00 pm and the next week 9:00am to 5:00pm. My coworker and I alternate these hours with each other week to week. Weekends we are both off.
My supervisor works Monday to Friday 8:00am to 4:00pm. Weekends off. However he is on call 24 hours a day every day of the week/year. He would like to change that. He/they (management) want myself and coworker to alternate weeks with my supervisor (3 man rotation) carrying the cellphone to answer these calls after our eight hour shift is over and also the full forty-eight hours of the weekend.
So the scenario would look like this when it’s my turn for the phone and I’m working the 9:00am to 5:00pm shift. Start on Monday 9:00 am work to 5:00 pm Answer all calls from 5:00pm to 7:00am and come to work if necessary for repair work. Start regular time on Tuesday 9:00am regardless if I came out the previous 14 hours or how many calls. This repeats for everyday through Friday. Starting on Friday at 5:00pm I answer all calls through the weekend and come out for repairs if necessary (usually). On the Monday morning following the weekend I turn the cell phone over to next person in the rotation.

They propose to pay us two hours call out time plus the time on the premises (if presence is required) at one and one half times our rate of pay (time and a half). No travel time is given and no calls are compensated if not having to come out on site. It is not uncommon to receive three to five calls while away from the premises.
At this time I would add my coworker and I are members of a union that is affiliated with the international brotherhood of teamsters. They have not been approached formally about this proposal, my supervisor has only discussed this with myself and coworker and we have told are grievance woman but an opinion from her hasn’t materialized and she seems reluctant to deal with the situation.

According to the bargaining agreement we have which I quote.
Article IV – Maintenance of standards
Section 1. It is agreed that this Agreement and labor contract shall provide for all the wages and benefits affecting the employees covered by this agreement. Unless specifically provided for, there shall be no other wages, benefits or working conditions provided to the union or the employees.
Section 2. It is agreed that the Employer will not modify, alter, add to, withdraw or inject any new plan of an economic nature covering wages or other benefits affecting the employees covered by this agreement without notifying the union.

My questions are these. Shouldn’t this proposal have to be presented to the union? I don’t see how my coworker and I can agree or not to anything on our own. It seems to me this has to be negotiated with the union.
Also is this legal? It seems they can, but I don’t know for sure.
According to the FLSA regulation29 cfr785.17
On-Call Time An employee who is required to remain on call on the employer's premises or so close to the premises that the employee cannot use the time effectively for his or her own purpose is considered working while on-call. An employee who is required to carry a cell phone, or a beeper, or who is allowed to leave a message where he or she can be reached is not working (in most cases) while on-call. Additional constraints on the employee's freedom could require this time to be compensated. See Regulations 29 CFR 785.17.

Example #12: An assisted living facility has four LPN wellness coordinators who are paid hourly. They rotate being on-call each week. They are required to carry a cell phone and be within 45 minutes of the facility when they are on-call. They are not paid for all time spent carrying the cell phone but are paid for time spent responding to calls and time when they have returned to work at the assisted living facility. Does this comply with the FLSA? Yes. https://www.dol.gov/whd/regs/compliance/whdfs53.htm
Lastly I would add this is happening in the state of Indiana and I don’t know what if any state regulations would apply.
 


FlyingRon

Senior Member
First, you have to tell us what state you are in. Treatment of on-call time, while it has a federal component is also addressed by state law.

One big problem is the quoted snippets of your CBA only discuss wage and benefits and not schedule changes which seem to be the heart of the matter.

The biggest question, if you are under a CBA, is why you aren't asking these questions to the union.
 

jimmyo1

Junior Member
State occurring

The state this is happening in is Indiana.
I will be attempting to contact someone in the union at a higher level.
I was looking for an opinion outside to further my knowledge in this matter.
I would add there is nothing in the cba which addresses this directly. However, I was
wondering whether "working conditions" as stated in section 1 might be referring in some way at least in part to scheduling.
 
Last edited:

FlyingRon

Senior Member
But alas, the snippet you posted only mentions that working conditions (other than what are in the CBA) are not covered.
You'll note the part about notification only covers wages and benefits.

Further, we've got no idea what the rest of the contract says (and no, please do not post it here).

If the union can't help you, you will need an attorney if you wish to push this further.
 

cbg

I'm a Northern Girl
I cannot speak to your union contract.

As far as the law is concerned, as long as you are paid for any time you are actually working, the law is satisfied. In this day of pagers and cell phones, it's rare that time is considered restricted enough so that you have to be paid for simply being on call. You have to be paid for all the time on premises; you may or may not have to be paid for time on the phone depending on the number and length of calls. I'd have to look up travel time. But there is no requirement that you receive any pay for the fact of being on call, and it would only have to be time and a half if your overall time is over 40 hours in a week.

Your contract may vary.
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
Top