Hey, all--Court today-
Other party failed to appear. According to court admin, he didn't even send up an intent to appear by phone request. (And I sent it down to him practically all filled out.)
Judge asked me about our respective relationships with the minor child.
Asked how often the other party has contact with minor child (no more than 12x over past ten years.)
He asked me what I wanted:
1. sole legal/physical custody--If he didn't order sole legal, then I was requesting I order other party to sign to authorize passport.
2. parenting plan as outlined in my motion
Judge asked if i knew what the other part wanted as far as custody, etc.
I told him that NCP wants:
1. joint legal/physical custody
2. child's last name changed to his
3.Child down to Texas for parenting time
The judge actually snorted and said, "That's not going to happen." (I loved this judge!!)
He asked why I was requesting the passport; I explained that it was necessary to go to Canada. He said we'd have no trouble getting in, but getting back into the USA would prove problematic. (have I mentioned this judge was great??)
Things that worked in my favor---The fact that I work in the court system, and work regularly with the cty atty, who sat behind me as an interested observer (I think it gave me some extra credibility

)
Judge asked cty why they were there, and was told "moral support" then as he's going through all the questions, he asked me what I do, and I told him my job (anyone who knows my name here knows my job.) Then judge looks at cty atty and said, "that's why you're here!"
Anyway, end result:
1. I was awarded sole legal/physical custody.
2. Judge set aside my proposed parenting plan and is ordering "respondent to have reasonable parenting at the discretion of petitioner."
I should have my order in 30 days, and small fry's passport in another 60 or so past that. we'll miss Christmas in Manitoba....but that's ok.