Hey, things could be worse? Cheer uptyson-bird said:It's humiliating doc.
As far as bad advice, that is what the disclosure is for.![]()

Hey, things could be worse? Cheer uptyson-bird said:It's humiliating doc.
As far as bad advice, that is what the disclosure is for.![]()
I haven't heard about a wardrobe malfunctionrmet4nzkx said:Hey, things could be worse? Cheer upThink of poor Jacko and his wardrobe malfunction.
He refused to come to court yesterday, was ordered to be in court within 1 hour or judge would arrest him and revoke bail, instead showed up 1:45 minutes later, in his jammies.tyson-bird said:I haven't heard about a wardrobe malfunction![]()
Maybe you need to update sj's thread!!!!
That's funny. The only part I read of that thread was insane getting mad at ya for stealing her man. Shame on you docrmet4nzkx said:He refused to come to court yesterday, was ordered to be in court within 1 hour or judge would arrest him and revoke bail, instead showed up 1:45 minutes later, in his jammies.
https://forum.freeadvice.com/showthread.php?t=221591
tyson-bird said:That's funny. The only part I read of that thread was insane getting mad at ya for stealing her man. Shame on you doc![]()
You need to follow the links then you will see why it was added to Judgy's dress and code of conduct.rmet4nzkx said:Michael Jackson apparently never read this and the judge is not amused at Jackson failing to appear at court, faining illness and arriving in his Jammies![]()
http://www.courttv.com/trials/jackson/031005_ctv.html
Today his accuser was to testify.
Think the defendent is in contempt?