Megan:
Your answer that a paralegal can do whatever work she can do for an attorney is patently incorrect.
http://www.dcba.org/brief/mayissue/2002/art40502.htm
I turn your attention to:
Canon 2: A legal assistant may perform any task which is properly delegated and supervised by an attorney, as long as the attorney is ultimately responsible to the client, maintains a direct relationship with the client, and assumes professional responsibility for the work product;
Why is that important?
Because when I assign tasks to the paralegal, include legal research, it is incumbent upon me to:
A) Check over the work;
B) Correct problems in the work;
C) Communicate with the client;
D) Assume responsibility for the work to the client and tribunal where the documents are being filed.
In the present case, you are talking about litigation. This individual is not talking about having the paralegal type up documents she already handwrote (e.g. secretarial duties), but rather about having this paralegal engage in substantive document preparation.
We have law clerks, second and third year law students, working in our office. We assign them projects, including pleadings to draft -- but the attorney signs the pleading, the attorney reviews the pleading, the attorney accepts responsibility for the pleading.
The purpose, of course, of this is to ensure accountability -- to the client, to the courts, to the public. Were her paralegal friend/relative to conduct document preparation, except under the direct supervision of an attorney, that would be a gross unauthorized practice of law.