I know the difference, the appropriate sections of code were cited and if you notice, there were separate instructions for party and non-party for depos in the section I cited, which you didn't bother to read. That section was required for the protective order. Now what were you saying about objectivity?meganproser said:Ok then. I hope you won't mind that I'm going to become a regular contributor to all of the forums you post in. [sentences don't end in prepositions!]
I am beginning to wonder if the information you give elsewhere is as incorrect as what you give here. I feel I need to protect others from you because I have seen you make so many mistakes. I've also seen you lose all semblance of objectivity when an OP ignores your advice.
I'm sure the OPs in your regular forums will benefit from hearing my opinions along with yours. The more opinions the merrier right?
By the way, have you learned the difference between a notice of deposition, and a subpoena yet? There is a difference and when an OP mentions that he’s a party, he doesn’t really have to tell us which of the two documents he received. Do you know why that is Rmet? Hmmm?
Just because you haven't any idea what you are doing doesn't make the appropriate references and referals incorrect.
QUIT STALKING ME AND OTHERS ON THIS SITE AND QUIT INTENTIONALLY MISLEADING OP'S!
I see you have already resumed your stalking behaviors that Mary warned you about, with your post to Victoria in London and your admissions here.
Megan, you are wasting your energy.
We will no longer waste time reading the Posers posts. Thank you, thank you.