• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

public school dress code

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

Status
Not open for further replies.

averad

Member
the Court has repeatedly emphasized the need for affirming the comprehensive authority of the States and of school officials, consistent with fundamental constitutional safeguards, to prescribe and control conduct in the schools. See Epperson v. Arkansas, supra, at 104; Meyer v. Nebraska, supra, at 402

Tinker vs the board of education ruled that a school can limit or require the dress code of students to maintain saftey.
 
Last edited:


BelizeBreeze

Senior Member
averad said:
Possibly:

the Court has repeatedly emphasized the need for affirming the comprehensive authority of the States and of school officials, consistent with fundamental constitutional safeguards, to prescribe and control conduct in the schools. See Epperson v. Arkansas, supra, at 104; Meyer v. Nebraska, supra, at 402
Corect, but as I said before, the poster has not asked the CORRECT question for what they REALLY want to know.;)
 

fairisfair

Senior Member
His parents (father) filed suit seeking an injunction against the school, trying to prohibit them from disciplining Tinker (and others) for wearing an armband, symbolizing his dissention regarding the vietnam war, to his school. As for what Averad said, yes, but the court also ruled that the school had no real reason to feel a threat to safety.
 
Last edited:

fairisfair

Senior Member
so are we looking at whether or not this issue is protected by the constitution? Whether or not a person can be made to wear a certain thing?
 

BelizeBreeze

Senior Member
fairisfair said:
His parents (father) filed suit seeking an injunction against the school, trying to prohibit them from disciplining Tinker (and others) for wearing an armband, symbolizing his dissention regarding the vietnam war, to his school. As for what Averad said, yes, but the court also ruled that the school had no real reason to feel a threat to safety.
Now how does this relate to the current post?
 

CdwJava

Senior Member
Well, I was grimacing watching what seemed like you floundering in the breeze (pun intended) so I just wanted to put an end to it.

I thought of it as a mercy kill. :D

- Carl
 

fairisfair

Senior Member
CdwJava said:
Well, I was grimacing watching what seemed like you floundering in the breeze (pun intended) so I just wanted to put an end to it.

I thought of it as a mercy kill. :D

- Carl

I WAS about to ask him if he was trying to make me cry. (wink)

He definitely makes you think though!
 
Last edited:

CdwJava

Senior Member
fairisfair said:
I WAS about to ask him if he was trying to make me cry.

He definitely makes you think though!
I haven't had enough coffee today to watch people twist for long ... I'm grumpy.

- Carl
 

Ohiogal

Queen Bee
Try Hazelwood vs. Kuhlmeier -- from 1986. Took Tinker and twisted it. Schools can regulate behavior that would normally be protected under the first Amendment if it could be disruptive.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
Top