Actually it would be because dad is committing crimes against the family. It can be worked in in that way. ASK GL.
Protective orders are intended to protect spouses and children from the threat of physical violence or abuse, in cases where there is no adequate remedy of law.
"Crimes against the family" limited to hocking a spouses jewelry and taking a child's bike can be handled via a restraining order to prevent further occurrences. This is an adequate legal remedy. Such "crimes against the family" do not warrant a protective order, as they cannot support a legally sufficient finding of abuse or family violence.
Since at this point the husband's current drug use is only speculation and unsubstantiated, this would not warrant a protective order. But there are other legal remedies outside of a protective order to deal with this, including but not limited to restricting dads rights of access and possesion of his child if it determined he is taking illegal drugs.
I am not sure what the reference to GL means. But I do not disagree that protective orders (even if only a temporary ex parte order used as a kick-out tool), "
can be worked in that way", if the facts are such that they would not otherwise qualify for a protective order.
But this generally requires an attorney willing to nudge (not tell) their client to stretch or misrepresent facts or even outright lie and say and do things under oath the judge needs to hear to grant the order.
Because, as everyone knows, when it comes down to he said she said on allegations that can never be proven for sure, nobody is going to blame a judge for erring on the side of caution.
Unfortunatetly, this happens in Texas a lot more often than most family law attorneys would care to admit.