That depends very much on the state where the property is located. Practices can and do vary from state to state.
that was a mistake i made early on, cuz i did not want to put my name on as the trustee. all my research was almost unanimously telling me the same thing. i am guessing that the overwhelming percentages tell you to put the name of the trustee on the title.
i also stated that it was not a do or die situation. even in california, i dont think someone will have a problem if the deed to a house shows only a trust name, without the trustee.
i am simply saying that the correct way of doing it is having the trustee name. anyone disagree with that, i am fine - show me the evidence of which states PREFER not having the trustee name on it. instead of simply saying that this is not correct in all situations, or practices vary from state to state. these are lawyerese comments. as sergeant friday would say, "just the facts, maam".
if you use google, i can guarantee you that you will find many, MANY MANY more sites telling you to put the trustee name on title.