Ohiogal
Queen Bee
And it is not high quality fresh fish either.
-
FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.
school principle got involved
- Thread starter Mamabear91399
- Start date
Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills Please click a topic or scroll down for more.
And it is not high quality fresh fish either.
I agree. Parents of kids actually taken by the NCP can't get into court that quick! Especially this time of year.
Mamabear91399
Member
OK I think I got it straight now, just got off the phone with my lawyer. There was a conference between my lawyer, the law guardian and the judge. The school principle sent kids records to all 3 parties. He spoke to my lawyer last week and the law guardian returned his call yesterday. There was a conference with the judge today. There is a conference scheduled with my kids in judges chambers this Thursday morning at 9:00 am.
Proserpina
Senior Member
Now I'm certain we're not getting the whole story.
Ohiogal
Queen Bee
So dad and HIS attorney were not present at this conference? Your attorney likes to play face and loose with ethics as does the judge apparently. May dad request that the judge recuse himself and then report the judge to the ethics committee of the New York State bar. Then your attorney and the law guardian also have issues.
Proserpina
Senior Member
Ohiogal
Queen Bee
I can predict what's going to come next
She called again and dad's attorney WAS there and he agreed 100% with everything?
Proserpina
Senior Member
The_Non-Mom
Member
That Taco Bell would screw up my order and give me hard shells instead of soft shells but the hard shells would be so soggy by the time I got home that I could roll them and eat them like soft shells?
Oh yeah. Or that.
Proserpina
Senior Member
That Taco Bell would screw up my order and give me hard shells instead of soft shells but the hard shells would be so soggy by the time I got home that I could roll them and eat them like soft shells?
Oh yeah. Or that.
Sue Taco Bell!
The_Non-Mom
Member
Sue Taco Bell!
Hey now, that's another forum!
LdiJ
Senior Member
I am really a bit confused by the responses here.
Its apparent that dad has made some poor choices in the past, since he has been barred in the past from taking the children to his home.
Its also not at all rational that dad went into the school and told them that custody had changed and that the children would be leaving the school, based solely on dad's petition to change custody. That of course would have raised a big red flag with the school...and again, wasn't rational at all.
We also don't know the details of what the child discussed with the school psychiatrist...but we do know that CPS is involved.
I do not see how we can say that the scenario could not have played out as OP described it...particularly on an emergency basis.
Its apparent that dad has made some poor choices in the past, since he has been barred in the past from taking the children to his home.
Its also not at all rational that dad went into the school and told them that custody had changed and that the children would be leaving the school, based solely on dad's petition to change custody. That of course would have raised a big red flag with the school...and again, wasn't rational at all.
We also don't know the details of what the child discussed with the school psychiatrist...but we do know that CPS is involved.
I do not see how we can say that the scenario could not have played out as OP described it...particularly on an emergency basis.
Ohiogal
Queen Bee
Except for the fact that the principal violated quite a bit as did the psychiatrist, mom's lawyer, the GAL and the judge. You don't see the ethical issues? Oh never mind. Forgot who was posting this.
The school LEGALLY has NO RIGHT to prevent a parent from removing a child UNLESS there is a restraining order. And we do not know that CPS is involved. WE know third or fourth hand hearsay that says they MIGHT have been called and yet CPS hasn't talked to the children. CPS has seen no issues. And, if CPS, is involved and they open a case, that case takes PRECEDENCE over a DR custody matter. And, judges realize this. So a judge is NOT going to make any decision IF CPS is involved until CPS closes their investigation or files a court complaint.
So if you know anything about the COURTS and the LAW, it is easy to see why it would NOT have played out like this person is stating. NOt to mention the school principal SENT the records to at least three different individuals -- including the judge -- and the judge read the ex parte communication and called a conference?
NOPE. NOt happening unless everyone in this is crooked.
Mamabear91399
Member
Spent the whole day yesterday at court. Judge did meet with kids in chambers for which seemed like an eternity. End result is dad can take kids to his parents house as always, his sisters house in Jersey, he can take them anywhere without a lady friend in tow, except his place of residence in Maryland (or into the state of Maryland at all) until trial set in March.