Haiku
haiku said:
***Is the website posted, the summer school in question? barring the schools demand that he child attend or fail, the program looks completely voluntary.***
No, in fact that site was posted by another poster as an example!
haiku said:
***The fact that mom cannot dictate what dad does on his time, maybe?****
Did it ever occur to anyone that not every custodial parent is out to screw the noncustodial parent and that perhaps mom's intentions are simply the academic future of the CHILD? Everything is not always a conspiracy against dad or against the NCP!
Educational decisions ...
such as summer school as well as summer camps, and extracurricular activities and such ... are VERY SPECIFICALLY adressed in the order. THAT is why the question was asked in the first place.
haiku said:
***Yes, the decision for summer school must be made during the mothers time, but, the summer school session is during dads court ordered time. Its the same thing as if you signed the kid up for little league on dads weekends, dad would not be required to take the kid, unless it was specific to the court order that dad take the kid to extra curriculars. ****
And this is where I disagree with the majority. The order puts no limits on the decisions but states that whoever THEN has custody of the child shall make the decision. Then, in the context of the order refers to when the decision has to be made. IMO
haiku said:
***all schools have to run by a legal calendar defining how many days they must be in session, the courts are aware of this when they outline vacation time around a school schedule. found missouri's schedule here, at thier school board website. there is no mention of "summer school" making up thier legal school year.****
I never asked for an interpretation of the legal school year! That one is a no-brainer! I asked for a legal interpretation of
summer vacation and if summer school would be taken into consideration, as it applied to the context of the court order.
Thank you for your opinion and interpretation.
haiku said:
***I am not a legal professional, but I have 10 years hands on experience and research, in 4 states, as a CP, and NCP,with family law issues. this is a "free advice" site you get what you pay for....there are lawyers here, but most of the advice will come from people who have 'been there and done that" with a few yahoos thrown in. ***
***without the childs educators to back up your decision,(the point being, your case will be that much stronger were dad to deny this request) sending the child to this summer program amounts to signing her up for summer camp, or going off to disneyworld, on dads time.***
Thank you for your opinions and insight. It is very appreciated, even if you do not understand where I am coming from or agree with me. I am very capable of appreciating and accepting opinions that do not coincide with my own.
I apologize if I come off the wrong way at all, because that is not my intentions, ever. I simply like to know what people base their opinions on or where they get their information so that I know how much merit it holds. Often times experience speaks volumes more than book knowledge.
Stealth2
stealth2 said:
This is the only place in this thread - that I saw - where the reasons for summer school were addressed. The child is apparently NOT failing, the child is apparently NOT in danger of being held back. Summer school appears to be something that is Mom's choice. Choosing summer school will infringe on Dad's ability to spend time with the child during the summer. Not cool at all. If child is not meeting Mom's expectations (and that's what it sounds like) - MOM needs to do something about it during the school year rather than penalize Dad and the kid during the summer.
While a judge may give serious consideration to the need for summer school were the child failing or in danger of being held back, it is unlikely when it's a voluntary situation.
Thank you so much for your input. I did not address the needs for summer school for a couple of different reasons ... the first reason being that when I initially posted my question I did not see the relevance. I do, now, understand why other's feel it is relevant; however, I still tend to disagree and think of it more as a legal semantics issue of who has the authority to make the decision and not a matter of why the summer school is wanted.
Simply put, (and this is the other reason that I did not address the issue), most parents have different parenting styles, different things that they hold in higher regard than other things, and different temperaments. Something that seems life or death to me in regards to my children may seem trivial to you in regards to your children and vice versa. I don't feel the need to try to explain or defend myself to you, or to anyone else, because I don't have to. The only person that I have to convince, if it comes to that point, is the Judge that hears the case.
As much as we would like to, no matter how good a parent is, parents simply cannot always prevent every cavity, every bruise, or every slipping grade. Just because the child had a couple of poor grades it does not automatically mean that mom is a failure as a parent or that mom didn't do her part in ensuring the academic success of her child.
Casa
casa said:
Issues a judge would more than likely consider:
1.) Is summer school being recommended by the school? ie; If he does not go, he will not continue to the next grade? If not, then the CP is clearly infringing on the NCPs parenting time.
2.) If the CP is so concerned about the child's education~ Where have they been ALL YEAR LONG?! No tutors, No help getting work/homework done all through the year? Hmmmmm The CP pushing the child's 'problems' academically will only demonstrate to the court the CPs failure in this area.
3.) The visitation order is pretty easy to comprehend (*IMO*) The child has visitation with the NCP which has to start prior to the end of the week after school ends. The child is to return to the mother before the beginning of the last week prior to school starting.
Thank you for your opinion and input. I am glad that most Judges I have encountered do not simply base a parents perfomance or child-rearing abilities on a couple of slipping grades, as you seem to. By your standards any parent who has ever had a child with bad grades or a cavity for that matter would be considered a failure. Maybe we should shoot them all on sight, ya think? Because, my goodness, where the hell have they been ALL YEAR LONG, if something like that happened, right?