The way he talked is that they responded to the law firm in TN saying, "we're not giving you anything" so now it's coming to us.
Maybe we just need a letter to dismiss.
OK, I was going to the wrong contract. Now, I found this:I was asking what your contract with your property manager says, if anything, about indemnification for something like this.
OK, I like this response. I forwarded the paperwork to my insurance agent and no response yet. Tomorrow, I will start pushing till I get to the CEO of the company.That's how it works. A denial due to lack of liability is often followed by a lawsuit and then the insurance company provides a defense.
There is no liability, or there is no liability coverage?Update: I contacted my insurance again and pushed them that I had liability and that all the advice I received was to go back to them. Our agent confirmed that the claim was moved to the legal department and gave me a number. Later that day, an insurance appointed lawyer called me and is handling the case. Yeah!! Thanks everyone for keeping me on the "Insurance" path.
But, while talking to the agent, he still indicated I had no liability. He said that rental properties can be purchased without it. And then went over past activity on my account like , one of our houses had asbestos and got canceled, another got canceled and reinstated for a "lost" payment, (their fault) so maybe the policy changed. I have the policy that shows we have liability and I researched "basic dwelling insurance for rentals" and it shows, liability "is" included for "basic" coverage. Then, yesterday, I get a letter from the insurance adjuster saying, they won't cover any medical expenses or payouts because we "don't have liability". Am I the only one that thinks they're trying to get out of this? At least, the law and evidence is on our side in the dog bite case.
Thanks again to all.
Liability coverage is standard in most landlord insurance policies. IF you opted out of this coverage, however, you probably will have to pay for your own attorney.Update: I contacted my insurance again and pushed them that I had liability and that all the advice I received was to go back to them. Our agent confirmed that the claim was moved to the legal department and gave me a number. Later that day, an insurance appointed lawyer called me and is handling the case. Yeah!! Thanks everyone for keeping me on the "Insurance" path.
But, while talking to the agent, he still indicated I had no liability. He said that rental properties can be purchased without it. And then went over past activity on my account like , one of our houses had asbestos and got canceled, another got canceled and reinstated for a "lost" payment, (their fault) so maybe the policy changed. I have the policy that shows we have liability and I researched "basic dwelling insurance for rentals" and it shows, liability "is" included for "basic" coverage. Then, yesterday, I get a letter from the insurance adjuster saying, they won't cover any medical expenses or payouts because we "don't have liability". Am I the only one that thinks they're trying to get out of this? At least, the law and evidence is on our side in the dog bite case.
Thanks again to all.