Tpr/

[fairisfair]

I am far from a fool, and you have no grounds nor basis to start calling people names! your response was very "kelly" like, so I asked a valid questions...if you do not like it tough, go on to a different thread! I never said because it was an option that she would be guaranteed to have it granted, but she is a mother trying to protect her son from being exposed to a life of drugs..

You called me kelly, I would say that is far worse.

 

[Mbarr77]

You called me kelly, I would say that is far worse.

Nah, never actually called you Kelly just asked! I apologize if I insulted you, as that was not my intention...When I first read your response I found it very harsh, especially when all my sister is trying to do is protect her son from a father that was convicted of selling drugs at a school...Obviously not what she wants for her son! I guess that is where my response coming from!! Again, my apologies.

 

[fairisfair]

Nah, never actually called you Kelly just asked! I apologize if I insulted you, as that was not my intention...When I first read your response I found it very harsh, especially when all my sister is trying to do is protect her son from a father that was convicted of selling drugs at a school...Obviously not what she wants for her son! I guess that is where my response coming from!! Again, my apologies.

Actually I am very sympathetic towards your sister, personally I think that all convicted druggies should have to do a test, each and every time, before they are allowed to pick up their child, if they are allowed to at all. But, then again, I think that custodial druggies should have to test too. Of course she is trying to protect her child, but chances of his rights being terminated, (unfortunately, in my opinion) are not good. Selling at a school and all he got was 2 years? that is disgusting.

 

[Mbarr77]

Actually I am very sympathetic towards your sister, personally I think that all convicted druggies should have to do a test, each and every time, before they are allowed to pick up their child, if they are allowed to at all. But, then again, I think that custodial druggies should have to test too. Of course she is trying to protect her child, but chances of his rights being terminated, (unfortunately, in my opinion) are not good. Selling at a school and all he got was 2 years? that is disgusting.

Actually, it is even worse than that...He was charged with possession of crank/meth, class 2 narcotics, attempting to overthrow sc narcotics laws, possesion of marijuana with intent to distribute,(this is where the charge in regards to the school comes in, but not sure of the exact wording) and possession of crack cocaine and all he got was two years!! it is absolutely astonishing...