• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

Transfering of custody or not

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

Erin Marie

Junior Member
What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? OH

We have recently been posed with a choice that we don't know what to do. Let me begin with background information (some of this was disclosed in a previous post asking a different question).

My husband "Joe" has custody of his 9 year old daughter "Sue". He has had custody since 2004. When he was still married to his ex wife "Patty" they lived in Oregon. When they split up, Patty originally had custody. Within a year Patty decided to make a suicide attempt (Patty has a history of mental illness). Friends of Patty called Joe and told him he had 24 hours to come pick up Sue or they would have the county take her. At this point, Joe had already moved back to Ohio to live with his parents until he could get back on his feet.

Joe borrows money from his mother, goes to Oregon, picks up Sue, brings her back to Ohio. When the divorce (done in Oregon after the suicide attempt) was complete, it was decided that Sue should remain with her father in Ohio (full physical and legal custody), Patty should never go off her medications again (and should report proof to Joe about taking her meds), and Patty would be allowed to have Sue visit her in Oregon 6 weeks every summer (pending the taking of her meds) and every other Christmas for 2 weeks.

Since then Joe has married me.

Anyways, while Sue is in Oregon visiting her mother this summer we get a call from Sue and Patty stating that Sue wants to live with her mother and wants to go to school in Oregon this year. Mind you, Sue does have some developmental disorders that we were in the process of having diagnosed prior to her trip out to Oregon (and planned to finish the mental health assessment when she came back). These disorders manifest themselves in her inability to understand or respect boundaries which causes her to not be able to make or keep friends and causes her to have problems in school.

Also, mind you, Patty has never submitted proof that she takes her meds nor given Joe the name and number of her psychiatrist.

While Joe and I know that allowing Sue to live in Oregon won't necessarily solve Sue's problems, he is still contemplating allowing it. Joe does not believe that Patty poses a risk to Sue, although I have apprehensions about it (mostly due to the reason that Patty lost custody to begin with). Also, Patty never has "her own place of residence". She lives with various friends. Currently, she lives with a couple of friends that are expecting their first child. Patty works sporatically (on purpose...she only works when the court makes her and quits the moment they stop watching) and lives in one bedroom of this couple's house (which is a step up from the couch she was living on previously). She claims that the couple has offered to let her babysit the new baby during the day in exchange for a place to live etc. If Sue would move in there, then she would live in the same bedroom with her mother (Sue is 9).

Sue is due back in Ohio on August 18. Patty and Sue both believe that if Joe allows this new arrangement then Sue doesn't even have to come back to Ohio and all will be fine. I know a bit different because I know that Patty can't register Sue for school if she does not have legal custody.

Like I said, my husband, Joe, is contemplating letting Patty keep Sue for a school year. He is not knowledgable of the law and is thinking with his gut as are his ex wife and daughter. I would like to provide a voice of reason in all of this. I would like to lay out for Joe what the process would be to turn over custody to Patty and what the consequences would be (i.e. how long would it take to "give" custody to the bio mother and would it be done in time for school which is 4 weeks away, what financial burden would the process be to us, how could we be assured that we would even see Sue again, etc.).

I fear that if someone doesn't give Joe and Patty the legal truths in black and white before August 18, then a stupid thing would happen: Sue would not come back to Ohio, she would not be able to go to school at all, and we all will be mired in a huge legal quagmire that would do Sue a great misservice.

Please help!
 


LdiJ

Senior Member
I can't believe that your husband is even contemplating allowing Sue to live with her mother again.
 

Erin Marie

Junior Member
I know it seems crazy for him to contemplate it. He is thinking emotionally, not rationally. Part of the long mental health assessment of the child has been to try and educate/convince my husband that his daughter's social/educational problems are not because he "took her from her mother" (he suffers very unreasonable guilt over how the whole divorce and custody played out...a level of sensitivity that attracted me to this man to begin with but is getting in the way of making good decisions in this situation).

Since he is acting out of emotion, I figure a good honest dose of rational/legal advice from someone in the legal field would help him to make the proper decision in this. Because its looking like August 18 is "D-Day", I was hoping to get him this rational advice before something stupid happens.
 

Humusluvr

Senior Member
That would be the stupidest, most utterly assinine thing your husband could do.

A judge gave him custody because mom is a danger to herself. A person that is a danger to themselves is also a danger to their child.

How's this for emotional? Ask Joe how he would like to goto try to get his child back if she's taken by the county? Or if he'd like to retrieve daughter if she's harmed? or worse? What if daughter dies due to mom's going off her meds?

This is not a time for emotional thinking. This is a time to follow the custody agreement and be a parent, not a fool.
 

majomom1

Senior Member
That would be the stupidest, most utterly assinine thing your husband could do.

A judge gave him custody because mom is a danger to herself. A person that is a danger to themselves is also a danger to their child.

How's this for emotional? Ask Joe how he would like to goto try to get his child back if she's taken by the county? Or if he'd like to retrieve daughter if she's harmed? or worse? What if daughter dies due to mom's going off her meds?

This is not a time for emotional thinking. This is a time to follow the custody agreement and be a parent, not a fool.

Well, Dad is in a pickle. He didn't insist on the proof he was required to get - so he is not being a very responsible parent. He may not get her back.
 

Farfalla

Member
Is there anyway you can get dad to come here and post on this forum? He really needs a reality check. Allowing his daughter to say with a mentally unballance mother who has no real place to live makes no sense at all.
 

mmmagique

Member
If I were you, I would take this approach: Ask Joe if he believes that Patty can get the same quality of help for Sue that you guys can? Ask him if he believes that Patty will follow up on all the counseling sessions and homework-type things which will need to be done to help Sue. Ask him if he really believes she will be responsible about it.

If he's honest with you (and with himself) the answer will be obvious.

Good luck!

~Christina
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
Top