what happened with?

[CJane]

We don't excuse other members for hijacking or being emotional, why should UC get any preferencial treatment cause "she was having a bad day and being emotional"?

Well, we also don't usually give grandmother's so much advice, or encourage them to be so incredibly involved in the legal matters of their children. But we did her. Same with daddenied... in other cases that may be JUST as bad, if the GF comes on the board and posts, asking for more information, we tell her she has no dog in the fight, it's none of her business, she has no rights.

It's interesting to say the least.

And yeah, I remember every damn thing too. Except names. Names escape me most of the time.

 

[frylover]

Doesn't it drive you crazy though, when someone posts such a drawn out story, and never posts an update?

I get seriously curious about some of these cases, and the people just vanish. And yeah, sometimes they become trollish first, but most of the time, I'd still like to know what happened. I'd LOVE to know whatever happened with "FamilyFirst" ... and yeah, this case too. Can't remember gramma's screen name though.

I've wondered about Family1st, too!

I was bored one day and read all her threads in the archives. My guess is that she lost on her "good Christian school".....or she'd have come back and told you guys you were all wrong and the kids are now going and dad's paying half.

 

[Rushia]

Well, we also don't usually give grandmother's so much advice, or encourage them to be so incredibly involved in the legal matters of their children. But we did her. Same with daddenied... in other cases that may be JUST as bad, if the GF comes on the board and posts, asking for more information, we tell her she has no dog in the fight, it's none of her business, she has no rights.

It's interesting to say the least.

And yeah, I remember every damn thing too. Except names. Names escape me most of the time.

LOL, I didn't encourage her at all. I'll admit that I have a bias towards gps, and I won't encourage them, I help the parents. Rmet and I stand on different ends of the spectrum of gp rights. I am completely for Parents rights whether it be mom or dad. I go out of my way to accomodate my childrens father. As Stealth has said "You picked him to father your child and you can't change your mind now." Also Ohiogal "Love your children more than you hate your ex." I live by those two statements and think all parents should.

 

[rmet4nzkx]

LOL, I didn't encourage her at all. I'll admit that I have a bias towards gps, and I won't encourage them, I help the parents. Rmet and I stand on different ends of the spectrum of gp rights. I am completely for Parents rights whether it be mom or dad. I go out of my way to accomodate my childrens father. As Stealth has said "You picked him to father your child and you can't change your mind now." Also Ohiogal "Love your children more than you hate your ex." I live by those two statements and think all parents should.

If you will remember this was about the father's rights, not about gpr it was just that dad was busy working and not computer person and his mom was and had access to computer and his permission to seek help for him. Be that as it may, because you folks turned this into a GPR issue jumping all over UC she doesn't want to post here any longer. I did hear from her and baby is fine and they get to see baby all the time, even overnights it is up to them when they say no there are some issues with mom and her behaviors, which is understandable considering her history, so she is in counseling.

Someone asked about Denieddad, He had a court date at the begining of the month and his ex got her contempt moved out to January so in the mean time he gets 1 hour supervised visitation every 3 weeks and he is not the one in contempt or that interfered with visitation. He is very discouraged. At this rate his children will be adults before it gets resolved and until then they are subject to a real case of PA.

 

[casa]

Well, we also don't usually give grandmother's so much advice, or encourage them to be so incredibly involved in the legal matters of their children. But we did her. Same with daddenied... in other cases that may be JUST as bad, if the GF comes on the board and posts, asking for more information, we tell her she has no dog in the fight, it's none of her business, she has no rights.

It's interesting to say the least.

And yeah, I remember every damn thing too. Except names. Names escape me most of the time.

For the record~ My involvement in that case was to support Dad who was only trying to have a relationship with his baby despite Mom moving out of state & trying to hinder that in every way possible. I have no gender bias, nor do I have a GP vs. Parent issue....when I see ANYONE alienating a child from their parents or family- I'm going to try to help.