Wife in charge of boys house in Belmont Mass

[LdiJ]

Why wouldnt I feel this is my business. We will see how an attorney would look at this.

You sound like some one who has done some thing similiar and thinks its all right.

I do not know why other posters consider this to be none of your business since your nephews are disabled and clearly you were (potentially still are) their guardian. I am not sure that what your wife did in manipulating them into giving her (and her daughter) ownership in the property was not a criminal act. They are certainly vulnerable adults.

I do think that you should consult a local attorney.

 

[Zigner]

I do not know why other posters consider this to be none of your business since your nephews are disabled and clearly you were (potentially still are) their guardian. I am not sure that what your wife did in manipulating them into giving her (and her daughter) ownership in the property was not a criminal act. They are certainly vulnerable adults.

I do think that you should consult a local attorney.

Now you're jumping to conclusions that aren't supported by any information we've received. The OP has has ample opportunity to state that he's their guardian, yet has failed to do so. In fact, the OP is clear that one of the individuals doesn't even live with him. We don't know that they are "vulnerable adults", nor do we know they were manipulated in any way, as the information presented doesn't say they were. The mere fact that the house was, in some vague way, transferred doesn't mean any manipulation has occurred.

 

[LdiJ]

Now you're jumping to conclusions that aren't supported by any information we've received. The OP has has ample opportunity to state that he's their guardian, yet has failed to do so. In fact, the OP is clear that one of the individuals doesn't even live with him. We don't know that they are "vulnerable adults", nor do we know they were manipulated in any way, as the information presented doesn't say they were. The mere fact that the house was, in some vague way, transferred doesn't mean any manipulation has occurred.

You do not call this a description of vulnerable adults?

One is 36 and has shizophrenia the other is 33 with obssessive personality disorder. They are not aware of where the money is going.

Sorry Zig, but I think that you are way off base on this one.

 

[Zigner]

You do not call this a description of vulnerable adults?



Sorry Zig, but I think that you are way off base on this one.

Neither schizophrenia nor OCD, in and of themselves, mean that a person is a vulnerable adult. With proper medication and therapy, both can live normal, productive lives.

 

[not2cleverRed]

I do not know why other posters consider this to be none of your business since your nephews are disabled and clearly you were (potentially still are) their guardian. I am not sure that what your wife did in manipulating them into giving her (and her daughter) ownership in the property was not a criminal act. They are certainly vulnerable adults.

I do think that you should consult a local attorney.

Remember, this is the dude begrudging the $10,000 a year in disability, saying his nephew spends only $40/wk. As with people who complain about child support, he is forgetting that his nephew is housed, eats, wears clothes, etc.

Additionally, since the nephew has qualified for disability, there are severe limits on what he can get $/month. It is likely the wife has set something up so that any income from the house does not adversely affect her nephews benefits.

OP has come here, belligerent about his wife, but it sounds a lot like a stb ex complaining about cs.

I don't care about what he's claiming about his wife's "manipulating" his annuity on page 2. This is again vague enough that one can't discern if she is doing something valid or malicious. The lack of specifics make OP sound like an angry person with an axe to grind.

 

[CTU]

I do not know why other posters consider this to be none of your business since your nephews are disabled and clearly you were (potentially still are) their guardian. I am not sure that what your wife did in manipulating them into giving her (and her daughter) ownership in the property was not a criminal act. They are certainly vulnerable adults.

I do think that you should consult a local attorney.

Where was it stated that HE was their guardian?

When did schizophrenia and OCD diagnoses automatically render the patient a "vulnerable adult"?