• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

Working Off The Clock Vs Falsifying Time

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

amazinggrace7i

Junior Member
What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? Georgia

My coworker was fired for working off the clock. She was facing eviction from her apartment and had been stressed and not performing like her usual self, which is definitely not normal for her. She was advised by our supervisor that for the last 2 weeks her productivity has dropped tremendously. She made the bad judgement of working off the clock, once she logged off for the day. However, she was not aware, nor was I. She was not aware that there was a policy against it. Upon being terminated, she was told that she violated the timekeeping policy. We both went over the policy and found that it did not specifically address working off the clock. She also spoke with a coworker as well as 2 Team Leads in different departments, who were also not aware of this policy. I advised her to appeal the termination, which she did. She received the following response:

It is very difficult to put every type of work violation into a formal policy. Working off the clock is serious because of the possibility that employees may not be paid for the time that they worked and companies are required to pay them that time. Consequently, you will be paid for the unrecorded time that we are able to identify, even though that time was not authorized and you may not have expected to be compensated for it. While the Employee Handbook and the Timekeeping policy do not specifically address working off the clock, both documents reference the falsification of time. The Handbook states “Employees who falsify any timekeeping record may be subject to corrective action up to and including termination.” The Timekeeping policy states that “An employee falsifying any timekeeping records is subject to disciplinary action up to and including termination”, and states that “missed or incorrectly reported time should be documented and sent to the time editor.” Not reporting your accurate work time is considered falsifying your time. If you believe that the decision to terminate you is unfair, you may request a peer review panel to review your case. Please make sure that HR has your new address so that we can send you the peer review request information. If you are interested in going before a peer review panel, you will need to submit a formal request to do so. If you have any questions, please contact either myself or HR manager.

Also, she never received a separation notice until after the appeal was completed, even after requesting it several times and being told that it was put in the mail. When she finally received it, it was via email with "Falsification Of Time" being the reason. At no time was this mentioned after after the appeal response. She never offered to email anything other than the "Employment Dispute Process", which she was advised that it was included with her separation notice. On two different occasions, the HR mgr stated that the separation notice was mailed but each time nothing was received. According to GA Department Of Labor, the Notice Of Separation should be given in person or mailed to the last known address within 3 day. She was terminated on 11/2/17 but did not receive a separation notice until 11/15/17. The appeal was submitted on 11/12/17 via email per instruction. She received a response from the appeal reviewer on 11/14/17. Also, my friend moved and stated that she updated her address with HR manager on 11/13/17, who stated that she would be update their system. She then offered to email it the separation notice. However, she did not send anything until 11/15/17.

Are my friend and I overreacting or is this odd? There are so many unanswered questions here:

1. Why did the reason for termination change?
2. Why does it seem fishy that no separation notice was received until my friend appealed the termination decision, even though the HR Manager claims to have mailed it twice?
3. Why was job termination the only disciplinary option, even though the "Timekeeping Policy" that she was initially told she violated states "May be subject to corrective action up to and including termination"? Especially, with not prior disciplinary actions on file?
 


FlyingRon

Senior Member
"MAY" means optional. It's not obligatory.

She was told the answer. It's not required that everything they could conceive of firing her for need be in the manual.
Barring being some government agency or subject to a collective bargaining agreement, the fact that there was even an appeal process is just good will by the employer.

I'm not sure what you're getting at. Violation of timekeeping policy and falsification of time cards sound like two ways of saying the same thing in this case. She lied on her timecards. I'm sure that's a violation of policy.

All that is required is she be given notice before they kicked her out the door. Delivery problems and timing is largely immaterial provided they deliver it when they push her out. The only requirement she be given this is to facilitate her eligibilty for unemployment (which she should apply for).

Barring specific laws to the contrary, they're free to fire her. There's no option that they provide any appeal or other disciplinary outcomes.
 

amazinggrace7i

Junior Member
Okay, Grace.

So what do you think the employer did that was illegal?

Due to my lack of knowledge regarding this issue. I suggested that she appeal because I wanted her to heard. I realize that there are policies to be followed for a reason. I just understand why she did it, which is not an excuse. I just wanted her to fight for her job since I know that she didn't know what she was doing was wrong.
 

PayrollHRGuy

Senior Member
What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? Georgia



1. Why did the reason for termination change?
2. Why does it seem fishy that no separation notice was received until my friend appealed the termination decision, even though the HR Manager claims to have mailed it twice?
3. Why was job termination the only disciplinary option, even though the "Timekeeping Policy" that she was initially told she violated states "May be subject to corrective action up to and including termination"? Especially, with not prior disciplinary actions on file?

The fact that you are reacting at all is odd.

1. Same thing different wording.
2. You said your friend moved and it often takes time for systems to be updated. I'm not sure of the time allowed by GA to actually produce that form.
3. No it wasn't but they are under no requirement to use any lesser punishment.

Tell your friend to go file for unemployment.
 

commentator

Senior Member
As I have said many many times, people believe they have a whole lot more rights and protections in the workplace than they do, until something happens. The reason why it was perfectly legal for this situation to happen, and for the employer to do what they did, was that there is no labor law that forbids them to do it. In fact, in your 'at will' state, a person can be fired at any time, for pretty much any reason, and only if it was for a protected reason, related to OSHA or EEOC or something like that, would there be any appeal of any kind.

Only in a unionized place would there really be any such thing as a right to be appealing the termination with the employer. The employer did not have to listen to or pay attention to her appeal in any way. And the employer does not even have to follow their own policies from their own handbook in regard to reasons for termination.

The reason that when she received the separation notice is not important because there are no teeth in that law. Its more of a suggestion. People need a separation notice to file for unemployment insurance easily. So there is a mandate that the employer give you a separation notice within some many days of your separation. This paperwork is not completely necessary, and is not really required in order to file for unemployment benefits, and when she received the notice, that little requirement is not something important enough that your friend could sue somebody about it, and therefore, it's not a very big deal.

Job termination was the only option, without warnings, because that was what they decided they wanted to do. Theft of time or falsifying time is considered "gross misconduct." That means it is something so obviously misconduct on the job that you are not supposed to do it, that no warnings are required. If it was a genuine error, a "forgot to.." and they believed it, they might give you a warning that if it happened again they'd terminate, but they by no means have to listen to excuses or give warnings before terminating you.

As is legal no warnings are required anyway, for anything, of the employer, but if the employer has not gone through a several stages termination process, it does increase the likelihood that a person will be approved for unemployment benefits after being fired UNLESS they call it "gross misconduct." She knew, even once that it was wrong to work off the clock or falsify time. That didn't take learning, or warnings for a reasonable person to figure out. She can argue to the unemployment office that it was a simple mistake she made due to stress, etc. But no one else is interested. You need to back away.

I will warn you about your friend. She may have been having the worst time in the world, but if she was having a lot of problems outside work, that is the very time when a person needs to pick up their work performance, (figure out how much they need to keep their job) and it does not by any means justify dishonesty in the workplace.

The employer is not legally required to care about anything except following the labor laws that do exist and making their business profitable. No one cares about her home problems and no one will accept them as an excuse for what she has done on the job if she has done something that looks like lying or stealing.

If you go all "Norma Rae" (if anyone remembers that movie these days) and start taking up your friend's cause at work and helping her fight it out with your employer, you may soon find yourself very much out of favor with them, and discharged or laid off or gotten rid of in some perfectly legal way yourself. Don't let this person's problems and issues with your employer ruin your job too. As we have explained, she really doesn't have any rights that have been violated here, nothing illegal has happened. They did it because they could.

Let your friend file for unemployment benefits and begin looking for another job, not following you around as you "seek justice" for her with her FORMER and your present employer.
 
Last edited:

justalayman

Senior Member
Due to my lack of knowledge regarding this issue. I suggested that she appeal because I wanted her to heard. I realize that there are policies to be followed for a reason. I just understand why she did it, which is not an excuse. I just wanted her to fight for her job since I know that she didn't know what she was doing was wrong.

It it illegal for your employer to alllow you to work off the clock. The company policy is irrelevent.
 

Zigner

Senior Member, Non-Attorney
I can't believe this OP is being so obtuse about this. It says right there in the handbook that “missed or incorrectly reported time should be documented and sent to the time editor.” The failure to do that is reason enough for termination. Taken as a whole, I can't even understand why there's a question.
 

cbg

I'm a Northern Girl
Then she falsified her time. She worked more hours than she put down.

Why is that so hard for you to understand?
 

PayrollHRGuy

Senior Member
She falsified her time by working and not clocking in. This puts the employer in jeopardy of violating state and federal wage and hour laws.

She is done there and it is a legit termination. She likely won't even get UI.

Get over it.
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
Top