wileybunch
Senior Member
What is the name of your state? Nevada
Recap: My husband just went through a contempt motion late August against his ex for alienation and contempt of the CO with visitation. He ultimately waived the evidentiary hearing if she would get back in line w/CO, make up visits be done, and other things such as bimonthly updates about activities that she always withheld from him, a cooperative parenting class, and she had to pay $3K in attorney's fees. Husband had let it go on "too long" really and the hearing would have been a bloodbath at that point, but if contempt happens again, he would not make an agreement again, he will let the full force of the consequences fall on her. It is very expensive to do this, though. His legal bill was $8K for 2 months as it was but luckily attorney reduced it to $5K, $3K of which she is paying back over 2.5 yrs.
It is 3 weeks since those things were presented to the judge as an agreement and her alienation hasn't changed and it's likely they will go to court again. One of her issues is that the 12yo should never had to stay all weekend because she should be able to go to church at home. We are LDS and the church's lessons and format are standardized worldwide though I understand there is a social aspect. Regardless, the judge wasn't swayed and my husband actually had *3* weekends/month vs. 2 for the next 6 months to make up for some of the contempt. She has told the daughter that even the prophet said xyz ... things that are completely untrue, but to bolster her position that she already wasn't successful with legally. Mother is a lukewarm member of the church, it's more about appearances and social stuff for her, keeping up with Joneses, etc. So not having her kids w/her in church is a big deal to her. Husband is not "forcing" visitation at this point with 17yo and trying to focus efforts on healing the alienation with 12yo (incl counseling), but it's an uphill battle b/c it's not just for past actions by mom, they are ongoing.
A little more background related to current question ...
Before the contempt hearing there was a weekend the daughter said she had to go to a bishop's youth meeting at 1PM on Sunday which is really unheard of, they are always at 7PM. My husband called her advisor the day before and was told as far as she knew, it was at 7PM unless something changed. Someone else in the ward confirmed it was at 7PM. So it was a lie. The advisor seemed to be friendly and cordial.
Husband received an email from ex this morning that included:
If you and {father} actually discussed anything, you would know he has call {advisor}
on 3 occasions. She is very protective of {daughter} and is disgusted with your
behavior. As I asked earlier, she would prefer to be left out of this nonsense.
*****
How I characterized his previous conversation with the advisor is not at all how she characterizes it so either she is lying (most likely) and perhaps also has fed the advisor "information" that she would be "disgusted". The only thing husband is doing is trying to see his daughter, not be cut out of her life as his ex is determined to do.
(BTW, she has started to address her emails to me because she doesn't like that he's taking a stand and not backing down so this is another intimidation tactic b/c she knows I help him and he's told her to not contact me again)
Now for the question ....
Should he do anything about the advisor to see if there is an issue with her and make sure that there isn't? Should he see if there is any clear the air or PR work that needs to be done there?
Recap: My husband just went through a contempt motion late August against his ex for alienation and contempt of the CO with visitation. He ultimately waived the evidentiary hearing if she would get back in line w/CO, make up visits be done, and other things such as bimonthly updates about activities that she always withheld from him, a cooperative parenting class, and she had to pay $3K in attorney's fees. Husband had let it go on "too long" really and the hearing would have been a bloodbath at that point, but if contempt happens again, he would not make an agreement again, he will let the full force of the consequences fall on her. It is very expensive to do this, though. His legal bill was $8K for 2 months as it was but luckily attorney reduced it to $5K, $3K of which she is paying back over 2.5 yrs.
It is 3 weeks since those things were presented to the judge as an agreement and her alienation hasn't changed and it's likely they will go to court again. One of her issues is that the 12yo should never had to stay all weekend because she should be able to go to church at home. We are LDS and the church's lessons and format are standardized worldwide though I understand there is a social aspect. Regardless, the judge wasn't swayed and my husband actually had *3* weekends/month vs. 2 for the next 6 months to make up for some of the contempt. She has told the daughter that even the prophet said xyz ... things that are completely untrue, but to bolster her position that she already wasn't successful with legally. Mother is a lukewarm member of the church, it's more about appearances and social stuff for her, keeping up with Joneses, etc. So not having her kids w/her in church is a big deal to her. Husband is not "forcing" visitation at this point with 17yo and trying to focus efforts on healing the alienation with 12yo (incl counseling), but it's an uphill battle b/c it's not just for past actions by mom, they are ongoing.
A little more background related to current question ...
Before the contempt hearing there was a weekend the daughter said she had to go to a bishop's youth meeting at 1PM on Sunday which is really unheard of, they are always at 7PM. My husband called her advisor the day before and was told as far as she knew, it was at 7PM unless something changed. Someone else in the ward confirmed it was at 7PM. So it was a lie. The advisor seemed to be friendly and cordial.
Husband received an email from ex this morning that included:
If you and {father} actually discussed anything, you would know he has call {advisor}
on 3 occasions. She is very protective of {daughter} and is disgusted with your
behavior. As I asked earlier, she would prefer to be left out of this nonsense.
*****
How I characterized his previous conversation with the advisor is not at all how she characterizes it so either she is lying (most likely) and perhaps also has fed the advisor "information" that she would be "disgusted". The only thing husband is doing is trying to see his daughter, not be cut out of her life as his ex is determined to do.
(BTW, she has started to address her emails to me because she doesn't like that he's taking a stand and not backing down so this is another intimidation tactic b/c she knows I help him and he's told her to not contact me again)
Now for the question ....
Should he do anything about the advisor to see if there is an issue with her and make sure that there isn't? Should he see if there is any clear the air or PR work that needs to be done there?