Maybe it is different where you live
Did you read the law you posted. It says right there there is no immunity for 11th AM claims.
Where do you get that Municipalities can not enjoy Immunity in any form?? They derive thier powers from the state.
Again, we are not talking about a personal injury claim as being hit by a driver in a govt. car.
Civil Rights violations are NOT the same thing.
If I sue the state or the federal govt. for violating my 1st AM rights, I do NOT need thier permission to proceed.
My complaint will be subjected to Cause of Action scrutiny, that's all.
Over here it reads
(a) General provision
(1)
A State shall not be immune under the Eleventh Amendment
of the Constitution of the United States from suit in Federal court for a violation of section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 [29 U.S.C. 794], title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 [20 U.S.C. 1681 et seq.], the Age Discrimination Act of 1975 [42 U.S.C. 6101 et seq.], title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 [42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.], or the provisions of any other Federal statute prohibiting discrimination by recipients of Federal financial assistance.
(2)
In a suit against a State for a violation of a statute referred to in paragraph (1), remedies (including remedies both at law and in equity) are available for such a violation to the same extent as such remedies are available for such a violation in the suit against any public or private entity other than a State.
United States Code: Title 42,2000d–7. Civil rights remedies equalization | LII / Legal Information Institute
Do you read it saying it is not waived? It is waived by accepting grants.
Ok now for municipal liability.
the County is not entitled to qualified immunity for acting in good faith reliance on state law. See Owen v. City of Independence, 445 U.S. 622, 638, 100 S. Ct. 1398, 63 L. Ed. 2d 673 (1980) (finding that HN46there is no qualified immunity for local government). Rather, the County is subject to liability under Monell v. Department of Social Services, if a "policy or custom" of the County deprived the Humphries of their constitutional rights. 436 U.S. 658, 694, 98 S. Ct. 2018, 56 L. Ed. 2d 611 (1978). The district court did not address the County's liability under Monell because it found no violation of the Humphries' constitutional rights.
Humphries v. County of L.A., 554 F.3d 1170, 1202 (9th Cir. Cal. 2009)
Read his multitude of other posts on the topic and you will get the idea.