• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

Assisting law enforcement with child abduction attempt resulted in termination

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

Zigner

Senior Member, Non-Attorney
All I'm curious about is how the OP knew which such certainty what was going on before the cops got there.

Exactly. what if this were an extremely agitated man who had just recovered his child from a female abductor?
 


LdiJ

Senior Member
All I'm curious about is how the OP knew which such certainty what was going on before the cops got there.

Well, the OP said the following:

a drunk man assaulted a woman in the parking lot of my (former) place of employment, took her child from the back seat of her car and was making his way off the property with the child in his arms

The police probably filled in the drunk part after the fact.
 

LdiJ

Senior Member
Exactly. what if this were an extremely agitated man who had just recovered his child from a female abductor?

Then the police would sort that out. Surely you are not saying that it would be better for a witness to assume that all was on the up and up rather than err on the side of caution??
 

LdiJ

Senior Member
And how do you know it wasn't his child, too?

Or just his child?

Again, the police would sort that out after the fact. Again, surely you would not expect witnesses to assume that everything was A okay rather than erring on the side of caution? Would you want a witness to the stranger snatch of one of your grandchildren to do nothing because they assumed that it was a parental issue?
 

CTU

Meddlesome Priestess
Again, the police would sort that out after the fact. Again, surely you would not expect witnesses to assume that everything was A okay rather than erring on the side of caution? Would you want a witness to the stranger snatch of one of your grandchildren to do nothing because they assumed that it was a parental issue?

Gawd, come ON.

:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
 

LdiJ

Senior Member
Gawd, come ON.

:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

I am sorry but I completely do not understand your point of view on this thread at all. I do not understand what you are attempting to dispute or where you are coming from.

You can roll eyes all that you want, but I am truly flabbergasted by your posts on this thread.
 

CdwJava

Senior Member
It is objectively reasonable for a witness to assume that an abduction is taking place when someone comes up to a woman and forcibly takes her child as she starts screaming! Many people would likely have dogpiled/tackled the likely offender and kicked the snot out of him before the cops got there. The fact that the OP and his associate only followed the offender while talking to the police on the phone shows great restraint - and greater wisdom and due care - than many others might have exhibited.

The scenario as the OP describes would give most any reasonable person good cause to act. Once again, kudos!
 

eerelations

Senior Member
It is objectively reasonable for a witness to assume that an abduction is taking place when someone comes up to a woman and forcibly takes her child as she starts screaming! Many people would likely have dogpiled/tackled the likely offender and kicked the snot out of him before the cops got there. The fact that the OP and his associate only followed the offender while talking to the police on the phone shows great restraint - and greater wisdom and due care - than many others might have exhibited.

The scenario as the OP describes would give most any reasonable person good cause to act. Once again, kudos!

Like button.
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
Top