Hopefully you are not looking for real advice

[OhioLaw]

What is the name of your state? OH
As an attorney here in Ohio I had a client that recently hired my law firm state he had received some advice from this website. (Which was completely false) Curious, we decided to see what this site was. Of the several posts we viewed, we only found 2 accurate responses on Ohio OVI law. (That's right it has been OVI for a couple of years now) Everyone posting on this site that is not a current practicing attorney in this field should truly rethink the ramifications of giving such inaccurate advice. Anyone looking for advice should call an attorney that offers that. Good Luck.

 

[Alchohol_Free]

I'm sure that's true.

But my advice comes from the standpoint of an offender who's gone through the process. Often times, the legal and the reality are quite different.

 

[ENASNI]

well

Thats why I only give bad advice to drunks from PA and CA.


Oh... and besides... I am not a lawyer anyway.
I usually just bring up the state laws from Google.

I am escaped Mental Patient.
My name is Dorothy Com
Dot to my friends.

I sued the World Wide Web for using my name without my permission, and sit
on my pile of gold and eat bonbons all day.
So now I just post inane comments on their forums.

have a nice day

 

[Alchohol_Free]

Enasi

Keep up the good work!

 

[rmet4nzkx]

What is the name of your state? OH
As an attorney here in Ohio I had a client that recently hired my law firm state he had received some advice from this website. (Which was completely false) Curious, we decided to see what this site was. Of the several posts we viewed, we only found 2 accurate responses on Ohio OVI law. (That's right it has been OVI for a couple of years now) Everyone posting on this site that is not a current practicing attorney in this field should truly rethink the ramifications of giving such inaccurate advice. Anyone looking for advice should call an attorney that offers that. Good Luck.

You? An attorney? Really? Since you cannot provide a citation on another thread I strongly suspect that you are a poster who didn't receive the advice they wanted and comming back as a troll.

Oh yes, have fun driving with those yellow or red license plates that let everyone know what you have been up to.

 

[JOHN BUCKNER]

It is Obviuos to the most casual reader that you Mr. Attorney have not read the conditions and rules regarding this web site. All postings listed on this site are for what it's worth to the person reading or asking questions.

If you have an issue with a posting then tell the person or persons in question. Anyone who would ask a question on a web site then go to court based completely on what he or she has read would be nothing short of an idiot. I am sure that I speak for most who take part in this Forum web site when I say you should always consult with an Attorney prior to a legal matter especially if it is a court issue. Even if it is just a consult. I have said this time and time again.

As one post had indicated, a lot of persons on this cite are going off of experience or issues in their life they themselves have been involved with and are willing to share with other people.

This site is to assist not to attempt to mislead or guide people in the wrong direction. I would be more intrested to know what threads you are eluding to.

Councel, if you have the time to type out a message to critisize, I would think you would have time to go to the threads you say are "wrong" and give your two cents worth. Or are you really an Attorney??

Not advice. For What it's Worth. Patrolman/J. Buckner

 

[AHA]

What is the name of your state? OH
As an attorney here in Ohio I had a client that recently hired my law firm state he had received some advice from this website. (Which was completely false) Curious, we decided to see what this site was. Of the several posts we viewed, we only found 2 accurate responses on Ohio OVI law. (That's right it has been OVI for a couple of years now) Everyone posting on this site that is not a current practicing attorney in this field should truly rethink the ramifications of giving such inaccurate advice. Anyone looking for advice should call an attorney that offers that. Good Luck.

Where exactly does is state that you have to be a lawyer to post here???? If someone has a serious legal problem and decides to believe everything they read on the internet instead of getting a real lawyer, then they deserve what they get. No one here, who isn't a lawyer, NEVER claims to be one!!!!!
In fact, there's even a special link you can go to IF YOU WANT A LAWYER, so if someone can't comprehend that simple instruction, then no wonder they have major problems. It's s free internet in a free country, deal with it or move to a communist part of the world.

 

[I AM ALWAYS LIABLE]

What is the name of your state? OH
As an attorney here in Ohio I had a client that recently hired my law firm state he had received some advice from this website. (Which was completely false) Curious, we decided to see what this site was. Of the several posts we viewed, we only found 2 accurate responses on Ohio OVI law. (That's right it has been OVI for a couple of years now) Everyone posting on this site that is not a current practicing attorney in this field should truly rethink the ramifications of giving such inaccurate advice. Anyone looking for advice should call an attorney that offers that. Good Luck.

My response:

Instead of bitching, why don't you contribute as a writer and attorney from Ohio? How about taking some time from your day to answer a few posts?

IAAL

 

[Rhubarb297]

What is the name of your state? OH
As an attorney here in Ohio I had a client that recently hired my law firm state he had received some advice from this website. (Which was completely false) Curious, we decided to see what this site was. Of the several posts we viewed, we only found 2 accurate responses on Ohio OVI law. (That's right it has been OVI for a couple of years now) Everyone posting on this site that is not a current practicing attorney in this field should truly rethink the ramifications of giving such inaccurate advice. Anyone looking for advice should call an attorney that offers that. Good Luck.

I really appreciate your post. As an Indiana attorney, I would agree. I see erroneous information posted on here all the time and try to correct it. You have to kind of expect that with this type of forum. My problem is when people imply through their signature or the language they use in their responses, that they have a legal background, or even that they're attorneys. (See IAAAL's signature above...he is clearly implying that he is an attorney...he is not.) Unless they come out and specifically state they are attorneys, the Forum Administrator probably won't do anything.

People don't realize that most legal issues are governed by state law, and state laws can differ widely. Also, when an issue comes up, people are often citing court cases from completely different jurisdictions which would only be, at best, persuasive precedent...certainly not binding on the court. If I went to court on an Indiana legal matter (that wasn't a case of first impression) and started citing court cases from California, the judge would think I lost it.

When I answer I try to point out that my knowledge is based on Indiana law, and I don't know for certain what the laws of other jurisdictions are. On issues of any complexity I often suggest that they talk to a local lawyer who concentrates his or her practice in that area.

I do find it interesting and entertaining reading non-attorney responses to certain legal questions. The sad thing is many people who write in are actually relying on the advice they are given. They shouldn't, and they're warned not to, but they do.

Sorry for the abuse you have taken for expressing your opinion. I too take a lot of abuse from people like Rmet, BelizeBreeze, IAAAL and others who are constantly providing inaccurate legal information on this forum. Unfortunately there's no polite way of correcting these people. When you do they immediately become hostile and start attacking.

 

[I AM ALWAYS LIABLE]

I too take a lot of abuse from people like Rmet, BelizeBreeze, IAAAL and others who are constantly providing inaccurate legal information on this forum. Unfortunately there's no polite way of correcting these people. When you do they immediately become hostile and start attacking.

My response:

I just love your "protectionist" statements. That way, if someone DOES disagree with you, or call you the "Boob" that you are, then you have an escape by saying, "See, I told you they immediately become hostile and start attacking."

We "attack" you because you don't know what you're talking about. Oh, you talk the "good talk", but when you stupidly answer California questions, you can't "walk the walk".



IAAL

 

[BelizeBreeze]

I really appreciate your post. As an Indiana attorney, I would agree. I see erroneous information posted on here all the time and try to correct it. You have to kind of expect that with this type of forum

Finally you've posted something everyone can agree on. Especially in light of you trying to answer a post from TEXAS without the information to provide a valid opinion. Seems a little like the pot calling the kettle 'african american' now doesn't it?
https://forum.freeadvice.com/showthread.php?t=226050

 

[rmet4nzkx]

I really appreciate your post. As an Indiana attorney, I would agree. I see erroneous information posted on here all the time and try to correct it. You have to kind of expect that with this type of forum. My problem is when people imply through their signature or the language they use in their responses, that they have a legal background, or even that they're attorneys. (See IAAAL's signature above...he is clearly implying that he is an attorney...he is not.) Unless they come out and specifically state they are attorneys, the Forum Administrator probably won't do anything.

People don't realize that most legal issues are governed by state law, and state laws can differ widely. Also, when an issue comes up, people are often citing court cases from completely different jurisdictions which would only be, at best, persuasive precedent...certainly not binding on the court. If I went to court on an Indiana legal matter (that wasn't a case of first impression) and started citing court cases from California, the judge would think I lost it.
(Very interesting, one of your recent posts you did this very thing on a question about California which any 1st year law student could answer, you failed and cited Indiana law and talked about quashing a subponea instead of how to respond to it or confirm it's service.)

When I answer I try to point out that my knowledge is based on Indiana law, and I don't know for certain what the laws of other jurisdictions are. On issues of any complexity I often suggest that they talk to a local lawyer who concentrates his or her practice in that area.

I do find it interesting and entertaining reading non-attorney responses to certain legal questions. The sad thing is many people who write in are actually relying on the advice they are given. They shouldn't, and they're warned not to, but they do.

Sorry for the abuse you have taken for expressing your opinion. I too take a lot of abuse from people like Rmet, BelizeBreeze, IAAAL and others who are constantly providing inaccurate legal information on this forum. Unfortunately there's no polite way of correcting these people. When you do they immediately become hostile and start attacking.

I am not an attorney and never have claimed to be an attorney. My area is neuroscience and forensics, which is a specialized area of law. One does not have to be an attorney to have expertize in law or related knowledge. BB and IAAL can speak for themselves. OP's only answer to any question on this site provided no citation after being asked, and while claiming to be an attorney, apparently is a troll. Rhubarb, has repeatedly failed to answer quesitons here with any serious intent or good faith and little if any appropriate legal references, Ruhbarb even fails to recognize OP failed to demonstrate any legal competence whatsoever. I've gotta go put that dang'd rib brace back on my sides hurt so much from laughing soooo hard

 

[I AM ALWAYS LIABLE]

I too take a lot of abuse from people like Rmet, BelizeBreeze, IAAAL and others who are constantly providing inaccurate legal information on this forum. Unfortunately there's no polite way of correcting these people. When you do they immediately become hostile and start attacking.

My response:

Well, there you have it. You successfully got all three of us to respond to this bullcrap of yours. Now you can say, "I rest my case" - - right, Rhuboob?

How's this: The next time you answer a post WITHOUT citing statutory and/or case authority for your proposition, I'm having your ass kicked off the forums. How's that?

If you were an attorney, you'd at least have WestLaw. Use it!

IAAL

 

[rmet4nzkx]

People don't realize that most legal issues are governed by state law, and state laws can differ widely. Also, when an issue comes up, people are often citing court cases from completely different jurisdictions which would only be, at best, persuasive precedent...certainly not binding on the court. If I went to court on an Indiana legal matter (that wasn't a case of first impression) and started citing court cases from California, the judge would think I lost it.

When I answer I try to point out that my knowledge is based on Indiana law, and I don't know for certain what the laws of other jurisdictions are. On issues of any complexity I often suggest that they talk to a local lawyer who concentrates his or her practice in that area.

Notice it clearly shows the state as California then Rhubarb goes on to note how a judge would respond, yet attacks IAAL, BB and me?
Quote:
Originally Posted by mgmkitty
What is the name of your state? California

An ex co-worker from a previous job is suing our former boss personally and his company. Her lawyer has called me several times asking me questions that I know nothing about, I told him I can't help her case and to not call me again. He continued to call and harass me and now I have received what looks like a subpoena to be a witness. The paper I received is a faxed copy, the only signature is from her lawyer (no clerk or judge or anyone else), there is no state seal or anything to make this look official. It also says "page 2 of 3" at the top, and I only received page 2. I'm incredibly hostile that this woman is dragging me into this, and if there is any way I can avoid wasting my time on this I will do it, but I will not ignore this if it is legit. Is this an official subpoena? It just doesn't look right. Thanks.

I'd get more information, but in my state attorneys can serve a notice of subpoenas on a witness ...they don't have to go through the Court or the Clerk's office. Now if a non-attorney wants to send out a subpoena, they have to go to the Clerk's office and get a form. But the form is already prestamped with the Clerk's signature on it. You just fill it out and serve it. You don't go through the Court at all. You do later file it with the Court. But that's just a matter of some clerk sticking it in the court file. With it in the file, the attorney or litigant can ask that the subpoena be enforced if the witness doesn't show up for trial.

You can try to quash the subpoena, but that's unlikely to happen. You might as well resign yourself to the fact that you are a witness and have to testify.
If this subpoena is for some reason is defective or not "official", all they have to do is issue you another one. Then it would be your burden to try to quash it...and that rarely happens.

Need I say more?
Sorry for the abuse you have taken for expressing your opinion. I too take a lot of abuse from people like Rmet, BelizeBreeze, IAAAL and others who are constantly providing inaccurate legal information on this forum. Unfortunately there's no polite way of correcting these people. When you do they immediately become hostile and start attacking.

need I say more?
I am soooooo dumb, I always thought a subponea was a summons, apparently Rhubarb believes it is a fruit if it should be "quashed"

 

[rmet4nzkx]

My response:

Well, there you have it. You successfully got all three of us to respond to this bullcrap of yours. Now you can say, "I rest my case" - - right, Rhuboob?

**A: make that four. Rhutard is an idiot.

I vote for Rhutard or even Rhuturd?