termination of rights

[happynow]

Still waiting for a response fromm the OP, but as Tigger said, her plans probally fell through. She must be buisy now working on plan "B".
I was in basic training with a man that had 6 kids when he joined, and he didn't have any waivers.....he needed the steady job...lol.
Would still like to see the regulation in writing.

 

[tigger22472]

Still waiting for a response fromm the OP, but as Tigger said, her plans probally fell through. She must be buisy now working on plan "B".
I was in basic training with a man that had 6 kids when he joined, and he didn't have any waivers.....he needed the steady job...lol.
Would still like to see the regulation in writing.

Does this mean this guy was your ideal and why you now have 6 kids??? lOL

 

[happynow]

Naaa....Tigger, 6 is just a nice round number to have..lol

 

[happynow]

And still nothing from the OP...HMmmmmmmmmmmmmm

 

[VANCAM1]

i offered to temporarily sign away our child until after boot camp but the father denied that option. the marines said that he could only have two dependents upon entry so he could get his son back. the mother is resentful to the termination idea and wont give the child back.

 

[VANCAM1]

our son is three, along with our marriage, and his other son is almost one. the other mother is younger and has expressed an interest before about not wanting the child. we were going to file for full custody this past monday but she left to texas from california on friday night. none of her family will tell us where she is. is there anything we can do to get the baby? he will be better off in a stable home. before she left she had left the baby with her mother and we babysat him for two weeks from 6am-6pm and when she heard that my husband wanted to join the service her mother made her go live with her father in texas and raise the child herself. the baby is the one suffering.

 

[VANCAM1]

what would the waiver do? temporarily relieve him of his rights, then he may have them back?

 

[tigger22472]

Once terminated there is no getting rights back. PERIOD..

The waiver from the Marines makes it so he can have the extra dependants.

 

[LittleBird]

yep, its true...

my fiance is in the army... he couldnt join with more than two dependants either..

 

[LittleBird]

yep its true cont.

my fiance is in the army.. he could only have two dependants upon joining .. after ait he can have more but he can only start with two. i read all the papers my fiance brought home because we made the decision for him to join together. my fiance has a son who he cant claim because he and i are engaged. but after ait he will ask courts for visitation and pay child support. there is no such thing as a waiver in army either.

 

[wukie2001]

Re: yep its true cont.

there is no such thing as a waiver in army either.

You are an idiot. One can get a waiver for just about ANYTHING in the United States military.. all branches. My wife is in the Army. She had to get a medical waiver. I also had to get a medical waiver to join the Marine Corps.

Hmm, you really should shut up about things you don't know.

 

[crusheroz]

I just had to reply to this. My husband is in the army, and when he joined he had three dependents (Me, my son, and our daughter), and he had no problems joining the service. This waiver BS is just that BS.

 

[usmcfamily]

Just piping in as the wife of a US Marine Corps recruiter here -- the reason that they are not as anxious to enlist those with multiple dependants is that they military recognizes that the first term of military service is one that is not exactly "family friendly" (because of the fact that the initial training and schooling may mean a separation of a year or more and the fact that until one reaches E-3 or E-4 supporting multiple dependants on the military pay alone is nearly impossible). As was mentioned there are "waivers" available for pretty much anything (though the USMC is one of the stricter services these days making some waivers harder and harder to get as they get more selective about enlistees ) - also, it is important to remember that things do vary by branch so that what one says is true for one branch isn't necessarily false just because it is false from your experience with another branch of service
For further clarification - waivers are not automatically offered to everyone -- if a recruiter has a good potential recruit but that person has some areas that don't pass muster he can offer them waivers to get them in BUT if the potential recruit is not a great candidate to begin with and they have some "problems" then the recruiter is less likely to offer them the waivers to get them in since they aren't a great candidate to begin with. (as has been said by my DH's NCOIC -- "you'd rather have me chewing your butt for rolling a donut (aka not making recruiting mission for the month) than for putting in a schmuck and having him wash out") --so waivers are more readily offered to those potential recruits that the recruiter has a "good feeling" about as far as potential success.

 

[fried eggs]

Here's what you do. File for divorce, then you aren't a dependent. Then, after he's joined, reconcile.

 

[happynow]

As I stated before, untill I saw it in writing that it was a regulation, I would tell the recruiter to kiss my a@@ and try a better branch of service.