• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

To all CPs and NCPs of Infants & Toddlers...

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ohiogal

Queen Bee
Yeah, see what I get for not reading the link? :o When I did go read the entire article I was VERY irritated. That 'quack' Phd is theorizing no child should go on overnights with their PARENT until they are 3 yrs old. :eek:

I would shred her :D

I went and read it when I saw you and others supporting the idea. I didn't see any positive things on my reading but was thinking maybe you and Silver saw something I missed. She would easily get shredded by me in court.
 


StampGirl

Senior Member
*big eyeroll*

I let my ex take our infant daughter on overnights when she was 4 months old. Why did I wait until then? I wanted to make sure she was sleeping through the night so as not to inconvienence the ex's mom who I KNEW would be the one getting up with her!!!

We did "phasing in" visitation until then: He had access to her anytime, anyday he wanted. Just no over-nights and only for up to 6hrs. ** recommended visitation by HIS attorney** He CHOSE every-other Sunday (on his weekends w/the other kids) for 4hrs in the afternoon.

What cracked me up was the look on his face when she was 4 days old (been home from hospital for 2 days) and he came to pick up the other 2 kids for his week-long visit (kids on vacation) and asked where she was. When I replied she was upstairs taking a nap he couldn't believe I wasn't letting him take her for an ENTIRE week when she was just a few days old. Yeah I am a meanie... whatever!! ha ha
 

Rushia

Senior Member
Good Lord! I am not an attorney and I think that article is a load of crap. My ex and I split when Peanut was 4 months old. She didn't go for an overnight with her father because of MY insecurity issues on it. I was VERY lucky that my ex was understanding and she started her sleepovers at 11 months old. No problems..... I certainly don't see any rage issues with her. LOL
 

casa

Senior Member
I went and read it when I saw you and others supporting the idea. I didn't see any positive things on my reading but was thinking maybe you and Silver saw something I missed. She would easily get shredded by me in court.

No, it was Silver & I who 'missed' that the article wasn't ACTUALLY about CPs & NCPs co-parenting infants/toddlers. The title of this thread is different than the title of the article....which turned out to be a load of bull.
 

Silverplum

Senior Member
No, it was Silver & I who 'missed' that the article wasn't ACTUALLY about CPs & NCPs co-parenting infants/toddlers. The title of this thread is different than the title of the article....which turned out to be a load of bull.

That's what I meant! That the article is TROUBLE. :eek:
 

Bloopy

Senior Member
INFANTS AND TODDLERS - (BIRTH TO AGE 3)
1. Visitation by the non-residential parent should start with regular frequent visits with both parents present.
2. For infants, initial visits away from the primary caregiver should be no longer than two hours.
3. For toddlers, time away may be increased to three or four hours.
4. After separation, if the child is distressed for an extended period, the child should be returned to the primary caregiver for comfort.
5. Overnights should not be scheduled until the child has sufficient language to be prepared for the experience and to understand where and for how long he or she will be away from the primary attachment figure - (age two or older).

Yep. She ranks pretty high on the Quack-o-Meter. Paid for and dreamt up by a litigating mother. (Isabelle Fox, not Peanut)

No separation longer that two hours for infants? BS! Forget issues of custody, mom (and she obviously means mom) wouldn’t have time to step out to the store or even sleep.

Then an increase to just four hours for toddlers? That means that no one, not even Granny could baby-sit.

But I would LOVE a judge to say, to the lawyer attempting to use this "study", “Hmmm, you raise a good argument. I see Dad as the best primary care giver. Mom shouldn’t have overnights until kiddo is three.”

Attachment problems arise when kids needs are not met, period.

The only nugget of truth is that if a child has had almost exclusive contact with only one parent then the child should take small steps (over a course of two months or so) to acclimate to the other care giver.
 
Last edited:

casa

Senior Member
Yep. She ranks pretty high on the Quack-o-Meter. Paid for and dreamt up by a litigating mother. (Isabelle Fox, not Peanut)

No separation longer that two hours for infants? BS! Forget issues of custody, mom (and she obviously means mom) wouldn’t have time to step out to the store or even sleep.

Then an increase to just four hours for toddlers? That means that no one, not even Granny could baby-sit.

But I would LOVE a judge to say, to the lawyer attempting to use this "study", “Hmmm, you raise a good argument. I see Dad as the best primary care giver. Mom shouldn’t have overnights until kiddo is three.”

Attachment problems arise when kids needs are not met, period.

The only nugget of truth is that if a child has had almost exclusive contact with only one parent then the child should take small steps (over a course of two months or so) to acclimate to the other care giver.

I noticed immediately that the graphics/pictures on that page were ONLY of women and not one male. :rolleyes:
 

jaxpink

Member
I agree this article is trouble however insightful.

I do know someone who began visitation 2 hrs with the co-parent for 4 weeks.
Then 4 hours for 4 weeks. Next 8 hours for 4 weeks and then overnights for 4 weeks and then standard visitation following that and that began at age 17 months old.

I can see someone taking this article and thinking it is true. Legally its not b/c the presumpitve is 1 overnight a week under age three instead of the whole weekend but it isnt always the case.
 

casa

Senior Member
Of course not. Testicles make you an unfit moron, don't ya know:rolleyes:...

LOL :D You know, even my NuttyX managed to not kill the baby when I went to work, shopped, or attended to my older child's school/sports events. :cool:
Geeesh~ these women are probably the same ones who complain the new Dad's don't "Do Anything" to help care for/raise the baby....until they split up, then suddenly they DON'T WANT them to care for/raise the baby. :rolleyes:
 

casa

Senior Member
Hmmm. Then castration would be the cure to this. Pre-emptive castration would have solved it before anything happened.

Ahhh, if I had the magical gun of sterility.

Yes, but what does castration have to do with testicles? Not having babies doesn't have to mean not having sex. :p
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
Top