You do realize that is only 10% of the important advice that was given, right? Did you hear any of the rest?
-
FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.
Family trip
- Thread starter stepmom4ever
- Start date
Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills Please click a topic or scroll down for more.
- Status
You do realize that is only 10% of the important advice that was given, right? Did you hear any of the rest?
Proserpina
Senior Member
We seriously need a "head-banging" emoticon.
Ohiogal
Queen Bee
The OP was asked to clarify. YOU are not the OP and therefore YOU cannot KNOW the actual fact but rather are assuming. Unless of course you can read minds.
Ohiogal
Queen Bee
YOU NEVER ANSWERED IF DAD WAS GOING TO GO. Ld has answered several times. But you have not answered that.
You don't have to let her go but a judge COULD ding you and hold it against you.
Ohiogal
Queen Bee
And OG, it has nothing to do with you being an attorney. I know you're going to behave in a prejudicial manner in all things Disney.
Hey just because I JUST returned from the Disney store at the mall with a huge bag of stuff and spend a while on their website and then contacted a travel agent about my fourth trip to Disney since 2004 does NOT mean I am prejudicial about Disney. Not. At. .... okay yeah it probably does.
But the point -- and the only point -- is that the JUDGE COULD DING HER FOR NOT ALLOWING THE CHILD TO GO. COULD. She has not answered -- at least not that I have seen -- whether dad is going or not> LD has answered but last I knew she was NOT S4E. The JUDGE COULD DING HER. That is a fact. It COULD happen. She COULD be crucified by the court depending. Especially with her comment that I have highlighted several times. That is the point.
TheGeekess
Keeper of the Kraken
Hey just because I JUST returned from the Disney store at the mall with a huge bag of stuff and spend a while on their website and then contacted a travel agent about my fourth trip to Disney since 2004 does NOT mean I am prejudicial about Disney. Not. At. .... okay yeah it probably does.
But the point -- and the only point -- is that the JUDGE COULD DING HER FOR NOT ALLOWING THE CHILD TO GO. COULD. She has not answered -- at least not that I have seen -- whether dad is going or not> LD has answered but last I knew she was NOT S4E. The JUDGE COULD DING HER. That is a fact. It COULD happen. She COULD be crucified by the court depending. Especially with her comment that I have highlighted several times. That is the point.
OP has posted:
Nothing about Dad going, too.
Proserpina
Senior Member
Hey just because I JUST returned from the Disney store at the mall with a huge bag of stuff and spend a while on their website and then contacted a travel agent about my fourth trip to Disney since 2004 does NOT mean I am prejudicial about Disney. Not. At. .... okay yeah it probably does.
But the point -- and the only point -- is that the JUDGE COULD DING HER FOR NOT ALLOWING THE CHILD TO GO. COULD. She has not answered -- at least not that I have seen -- whether dad is going or not> LD has answered but last I knew she was NOT S4E. The JUDGE COULD DING HER. That is a fact. It COULD happen. She COULD be crucified by the court depending. Especially with her comment that I have highlighted several times. That is the point.
And though I hate to admit it, even though S4E has been given the benefit of the doubt several times in this thread...her final response said so, so much.
Unfortunately. Maybe I'm reading too much into it.
LdiJ
Senior Member
She also said in her very first post:
That certainly doesn't sound like dad is going.
Just Blue
Senior Member
Did you read this before posting?
Proserpina
Senior Member
Given the grammar and spelling used (or lack thereof), I can see how that can actually be taken BOTH ways.
As OP is obviously happy to know that she doesn't have to let the child go, anyone for ice-cream?
LdiJ
Senior Member
Yep...did you read the rest?
What is it more likely that she meant?
They are taking my husband's other child.....
Or, they are taking my husband and his other child?
Particularly when you combine it with:
"I personally dont want her to go, she only 16 months and never been away from my husband and I.... she never been gone from us!"
Just Blue
Senior Member
LdiJ
Senior Member
I actually DID misread it. I'm sorry...
It happens to all of us now and then. No worries.
- Status