And the father could make a point of communicating with his daughter so that he is aware of these activities well in advance. It is easy to put responsibilities on the mother and say "SHE is responsible for executing the court order". How about Dad simply being more assertive in his communications with his daughter. Nothing is to be gained from turning every issue into a "legal" issue for the courts to decide. He may win in court and get the mother held in contempt for allowing the daughter to have a voice--but he will lose in the long term.
The courts and certainly the attorney's DO NOT CARE what long term relationship exists between the parents and the children. They simply welcome confrontation and strife--not because it is good for Dad or good for the daughter--but it is good for their employment and balance sheets.
I urge this Dad to communicate with the daughter--tell her how you feel--sit down and look at a calendar of activities with your daughter--work on a plan that allows her to attend her activities (with you present) and also allows you to plan special time with her. Don't get locked into anything as children have a lot going on in their lives and to the extent that parents can support and be a part--that is good for them. As a CP--my whole schedule revolves around school activities, extracurricular activities, sleep overs and supporting my son's emotional and social development. I FREQUENTLY do things that are NOT convenient and at times interfere with what I would llike to do--that is what being a parent is about. A large majority of this investment in my child requires that I remain flexible and not locked into my own "personal" wishes. Keep the focus on your daughter and not on creating conflict because you CAN. Remember--you and your atty will likely win in court--by asserting that the mother "is not forcing the child to exercise visitation"--but you will not win in the relationship with your daughter --and the attorney and judge will not be able to ORDER your daughter to have a relationship with you when the mother can no longer be held in contempt.
The courts and certainly the attorney's DO NOT CARE what long term relationship exists between the parents and the children. They simply welcome confrontation and strife--not because it is good for Dad or good for the daughter--but it is good for their employment and balance sheets.
I urge this Dad to communicate with the daughter--tell her how you feel--sit down and look at a calendar of activities with your daughter--work on a plan that allows her to attend her activities (with you present) and also allows you to plan special time with her. Don't get locked into anything as children have a lot going on in their lives and to the extent that parents can support and be a part--that is good for them. As a CP--my whole schedule revolves around school activities, extracurricular activities, sleep overs and supporting my son's emotional and social development. I FREQUENTLY do things that are NOT convenient and at times interfere with what I would llike to do--that is what being a parent is about. A large majority of this investment in my child requires that I remain flexible and not locked into my own "personal" wishes. Keep the focus on your daughter and not on creating conflict because you CAN. Remember--you and your atty will likely win in court--by asserting that the mother "is not forcing the child to exercise visitation"--but you will not win in the relationship with your daughter --and the attorney and judge will not be able to ORDER your daughter to have a relationship with you when the mother can no longer be held in contempt.