-
FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.
Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills Please click a topic or scroll down for more.
M
meerkat3232
Guest
James Young.... I Love You Man!!!!
OMG, there is another intelligent person out there.
Mr. Young sir, could'nt have said it all any better myself! Good try with these folks, but unfortunately it's impossible to educate people who base their beliefs and decisions on opinion rather than fact.
MK
OMG, there is another intelligent person out there.
Mr. Young sir, could'nt have said it all any better myself! Good try with these folks, but unfortunately it's impossible to educate people who base their beliefs and decisions on opinion rather than fact.
MK
BelizeBreeze
Senior Member
And yet you did. Oh well, the definition of your ass overloading your mouth.
Wow, a moron congratulating another moron. Not much value in it, but kind of humorous!meerkat3232 said:
Now, we just have to figure out someway to get this two 'speed law ignorant' idiots to get on the same road, heading toward each other, each ignoring the speed laws (since they think it somehow beneath them) and crash into each other.
With any luck, their individual gene pools would be removed from society... and increase the overall IQ of mankind at the same time!!
Last edited:
Happy Trails
Senior Member
**Funny thing is this guy thinks I'm voting for him.
I dated an analyst for almost two years. I got a migraine from him too.
I dated an analyst for almost two years. I got a migraine from him too.
JETX said:Wow, a moron congratulating another moron. Not much value in it, but kind of humorous!
Now, we just have to figure out someway to get this two 'speed law ignorant' idiots to get on the same road, heading toward each other, each ignoring the speed laws (since they think it somehow beneath them) and crash into each other.
With any luck, their individual gene pools would be removed from society... and increase the overall IQ of mankind at the same time!!
AMEN
James Young
Member
meerkat3232 said:
Thank you.
James Young
Member
AHA writes:
I'm not going to apologize for not breaking the law…
Nobody is asking you to apologize for not breaking the law. That’s just another straw Man argument. All I’m asking is that you base your opinions on facts and science rather than fear and opinion, just the same as any other educated person.
I'm not going to apologize for not breaking the law…
Nobody is asking you to apologize for not breaking the law. That’s just another straw Man argument. All I’m asking is that you base your opinions on facts and science rather than fear and opinion, just the same as any other educated person.
James Young
Member
Belize Breeze writes:
Quote of JY:
Without knowing exactly what a “free speeding limit” is, I hesitate to respond.
And yet you did. Oh well, the definition of your ass overloading your mouth.
Typical cop puerile humor notwithstanding, I said “hesitate to respond,” not “not respond. See infra.
Quote of JY:
Without knowing exactly what a “free speeding limit” is, I hesitate to respond.
And yet you did. Oh well, the definition of your ass overloading your mouth.
Typical cop puerile humor notwithstanding, I said “hesitate to respond,” not “not respond. See infra.
James Young
Member
AHA writes:
For the person who doesn't know what free speeding limit is, could it mean........hm free speeding limit.
No, it couldn’t. “Free speeding” and “limit” are conflicting or canceling terms. One cannot have “free speeding” and a “limit” concurrently. Also, I’m making the assumption that you really mean “unrestricted” speeds when you say “free speeding.”
You are the one against speed limits, so I don't think it is impossible to understand what it meant.
I am opposed to bad speed limits, that is, the ones set for political or economic reasons rather than as the result of engineering analysis. I would favor a return to unrestricted speeds on certain sections of roadways in the Western US. Ninety-fifth percentile speeds across much of the area are already reaching 90+ mph so recognizing the reality is better than the Chicken Little approach currently in place. Montana and Nevada have already had R&P limits in their past and even Kansas had 85 mph before the NMSL, so it is not unprecedented. In the meantime, using speed limits to generate agency revenue or for any other unproven policy is dishonest.
For the person who doesn't know what free speeding limit is, could it mean........hm free speeding limit.
No, it couldn’t. “Free speeding” and “limit” are conflicting or canceling terms. One cannot have “free speeding” and a “limit” concurrently. Also, I’m making the assumption that you really mean “unrestricted” speeds when you say “free speeding.”
You are the one against speed limits, so I don't think it is impossible to understand what it meant.
I am opposed to bad speed limits, that is, the ones set for political or economic reasons rather than as the result of engineering analysis. I would favor a return to unrestricted speeds on certain sections of roadways in the Western US. Ninety-fifth percentile speeds across much of the area are already reaching 90+ mph so recognizing the reality is better than the Chicken Little approach currently in place. Montana and Nevada have already had R&P limits in their past and even Kansas had 85 mph before the NMSL, so it is not unprecedented. In the meantime, using speed limits to generate agency revenue or for any other unproven policy is dishonest.
James Young
Member
JETX writes:
Now, we just have to figure out someway to get this two 'speed law ignorant' idiots to get on the same road, heading toward each other, each ignoring the speed laws (since they think it somehow beneath them) and crash into each other.
With any luck, their individual gene pools would be removed from society... and increase the overall IQ of mankind at the same time!!
Again, more puerile cop humor. We had the same thing 40 years ago in the ER. It wasn’t funny in 1965 and it’s still not funny. It’s not good analysis or observation. It’s not even good protection any more. All it does is further isolate you from the public. And then you wonder why there is such disrespect, nay, such contempt, for cops.
JETX, from your shallowness of your contributions to these fora, I’d be cautious about that gene pool. I’m willing to put up my knowledge, skills, facts and background against what you’ve presented so far. The problem with you (and other cops) is not what you don’t know but what you think you know that just isn’t so. That, of course, is the result of interacting with nobody but like-minded but equally ignorant folks.
Now, we just have to figure out someway to get this two 'speed law ignorant' idiots to get on the same road, heading toward each other, each ignoring the speed laws (since they think it somehow beneath them) and crash into each other.
With any luck, their individual gene pools would be removed from society... and increase the overall IQ of mankind at the same time!!
Again, more puerile cop humor. We had the same thing 40 years ago in the ER. It wasn’t funny in 1965 and it’s still not funny. It’s not good analysis or observation. It’s not even good protection any more. All it does is further isolate you from the public. And then you wonder why there is such disrespect, nay, such contempt, for cops.
JETX, from your shallowness of your contributions to these fora, I’d be cautious about that gene pool. I’m willing to put up my knowledge, skills, facts and background against what you’ve presented so far. The problem with you (and other cops) is not what you don’t know but what you think you know that just isn’t so. That, of course, is the result of interacting with nobody but like-minded but equally ignorant folks.
James Young said:
Jesus, do you have to take every single little wording so seriously, there's got to be better things you can spend time on, no?
FREE speeding LIMIT as in free limit, no limit. What's the point, you don't get anything that anyone writes here anyway, facts are we do have speeding limits so if it's because of politics is beside the point. The limits are as likely to disappear as drunk drivers, ie never. You can preach all you want about getting rid of speed limits, it's a frightening thought to want Formula 1 races on public roads with pedestrian crossings and school districts, but that's your wish. Please don't claim people that don't agree with you are ignorant. It's a free country, I can think what I want.......same as you.
This James Young twit reminds me of the spoiled 2nd grader who just has to be the center of attention. He might be the one that is the class clown, always making farting sounds when the teachers back is turned. Or maybe the one who cries "PICK ME!! PICK ME!!" with his hand thrust into the air when the teacher asks for an answer.
On this forum, he simply can't keep his mouth shut. He feels that he has to respond to every post and continually yells "LOOK AT ME!!" with them.
Personally, I am going to treat him like you always treat a spoiled child who holds their breath until noticed. Simply ignore him. He will hopefully realize that he isn't getting attention from anyone... and go away.
But, regretably, I am also willing to bet that he won't ignore this post, either.
Lets all wave goodbye to 'James Young'.... at least until he returns to the post asking what to do about being sued by the victims that are injured because of his ignorance..... and arrogance.
On this forum, he simply can't keep his mouth shut. He feels that he has to respond to every post and continually yells "LOOK AT ME!!" with them.
Personally, I am going to treat him like you always treat a spoiled child who holds their breath until noticed. Simply ignore him. He will hopefully realize that he isn't getting attention from anyone... and go away.
But, regretably, I am also willing to bet that he won't ignore this post, either.
Lets all wave goodbye to 'James Young'.... at least until he returns to the post asking what to do about being sued by the victims that are injured because of his ignorance..... and arrogance.