• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

Rights to first child terminated; now have new child. HELP!!

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

Status
Not open for further replies.


casa

Senior Member
AHA said:
I wasn't replying to anyone (no quoting in my post), just stating the fact that having a kid usually makes people change their life, but in this case, mom has already had 2 kids that didn't make her improve her life, so chances might be that the third kid won't have an effect either.
But if dad is clear, in every way, of any type of drugs, then obviously he would be proving to be the "better" parent.

Definately a situation of the lessor of two evils. :(
 

AHA

Senior Member
THE PRACTICE-36 said:
My response:

Why did you put the word "better" in quotes? Please define what you mean by "better."

IAAL

No child should be raised by drug addicts. Even if two years off drugs is considered amazing in the drug world, it's still a drop in the ocean when it comes to a life time of teaching kids values, morals, selfrespect and common sense.
Since mom is still addicted to drugs and dad (allegedly, mind you) isn't, he would be a more reasonable and worthy a chance, although VERY supervised, but like I said, IMO none is a good parent for a special needs child.
 

Just Blue

Senior Member
Please remember folks...OP thinks it's fine that the "mother" fed his child a narcodic. He still has "wet brain"...He should not be given a baby to raise.
 

casa

Senior Member
baystategirl said:
Please remember folks...OP thinks it's fine that the "mother" fed his child a narcodic. He still has "wet brain"...He should not be given a baby to raise.

I think we ALL agree this is an awful situation...but legally, Dad does have a chance at getting custody of this baby. (IF he fights for it and IF the child is more important than his love life):rolleyes:
 

Just Blue

Senior Member
casa said:
I think we ALL agree this is an awful situation...but legally, Dad does have a chance at getting custody of this baby. (IF he fights for it and IF the child is more important than his love life):rolleyes:


Well...Lets hope that he figures out that he is no way able to give this poor child what it will need...After all...He didn't bother to "fight" to have the mother stop giving the child drugs....
 

Shay-Pari'e

Senior Member
casa said:
I (and I think LdiJ is as well) are referring to the DAD. He's got 2 years sober and has never had any children taken from him. I think the only 'chance' in this situation is if Dad dumps Mom and moves on with his new life with the baby.

I do question Daddio. He has been on the methadone for TWO years. He is not over his addiction, he is milking the system for a high.

I also question Daddio for knocking up a drug addict.

This child deserves the best care possible, and it is with neither of them.

Come on, he moved to NJ but had no address to give the doc?
 
S

shell007

Guest
Shay-Pari'e said:
casa said:
I (and I think LdiJ is as well) are referring to the DAD. He's got 2 years sober and has never had any children taken from him. I think the only 'chance' in this situation is if Dad dumps Mom and moves on with his new life with the baby.

I do question Daddio. He has been on the methadone for TWO years. He is not over his addiction, he is milking the system for a high.

I also question Daddio for knocking up a drug addict.

This child deserves the best care possible, and it is with neither of them.

Come on, he moved to NJ but had no address to give the doc?

For drug addicts....I guess something (methadone) is better than nothing!! :rolleyes:
 

nextwife

Senior Member
AHA said:
Although TWO previous babies did not make her straighten up her life, what are the chances baby # 3 will? :confused: :confused:

Yup. This child deserves BETTER than to have a two time child neglector as their parent! For pete's sake, just because she can keep procreating does NOT mean she is in any way REALLY capable of putting the CHILD'S NEEDS first. If she cared about the child's needs she would NOT have subjected the baby to damaging chemicals. She's PROVEN, by letting her child be born addicted, that she simply isn't willing to do what it takes to be a capable, RESPONSIBLE adult and raise AND SUPPORT her child.

The ONLY chance this kid has at a REAL future is if mom and dad relinquish their rights and let this child get a stable home from the start. The child should not be left with them to experiment and see if, maybe they might, possibly, be able to rise to the occasion and be the attentive, involved and well-informed parent this now-damaged child, with learning, attention and other prenatal disablities, truly will need!
 
Last edited:

THE PRACTICE-36

Junior Member
nextwife said:
This child deserves BETTER than to have a two time child neglector as their parent! For pete's sake, just because she can keep procreating does NOT mean she is in any way REALLY capable of putting the CHILD'S NEEDS first. If she cared about the child's needs she would NOT have subjected thde baby to damaging chemicals. She's PROVEN, by letting her child be born addicted, that she simply isn't willing to do what it takes to be a capable, RESPONSIBLE adult and raise AND SUPPORT her child.

The ONLY chance this kid has at a REAL future is if mom and dad relinquish their rights and let this child get a stable home from the start. The child should not be left with them to experiment and see if, maybe they might, possibly, be able to rise to the occasion and be the attentive, involved and well-informed parent this now-damaged child, with learning, attention and other prenatal disablities, truly will need!


My response:

Yeah, we've already discussed this thread to death. You're a little late.

IAAL
 

nextwife

Senior Member
THE PRACTICE-36 said:
My response:

Yeah, we've already discussed this thread to death. You're a little late.

IAAL

Cranky?

Sorry I came in late. I had to take kiddo to religious school and then basketball league practice.
 

natsteel

Junior Member
shellandty said:
Since you seem to have all of the answeres....why are you posting here????

Are you going to argue every point that is brought up, or are you looking for correct legal advice, and willing to put your personal feelings/attitude aside?



The only point I'm arguing is that I live in a cardboard box.

Mike Hattem
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
Top